Literature DB >> 29532322

Commissioning and validation of fluence-based 3D VMAT dose reconstruction system using new transmission detector.

Yuji Nakaguchi1, Takeshi Oono2, Masato Maruyama3, Yoshinobu Shimohigashi3, Yudai Kai3, Yuya Nakamura3.   

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the basic performance of the three-dimensional dose verification system COMPASS (IBA Dosimetry). This system is capable of reconstructing 3D dose distributions on the patient anatomy based on the fluence measured using a new transmission detector (Dolphin, IBA Dosimetry) during treatment. The stability of the absolute dose and geometric calibrations of the COMPASS system with the Dolphin detector were investigated for fundamental validation. Furthermore, multileaf collimator (MLC) test patterns and a complicated volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan were used to evaluate the accuracy of the reconstructed dose distributions determined by the COMPASS. The results from the COMPASS were compared with those of a Monte Carlo simulation (MC), EDR2 film measurement, and a treatment planning system (TPS). The maximum errors for the absolute dose and geometrical position were - 0.28% and 1.0 mm for 3 months, respectively. The Dolphin detector, which consists of ionization chamber detectors, was firmly mounted on the linear accelerator and was very stable. For the MLC test patterns, the TPS showed a > 5% difference at small fields, while the COMPASS showed good agreement with the MC simulation at small fields. However, the COMPASS produced a large error for complex small fields. For a clinical VMAT plan, COMPASS was more accurate than TPS. COMPASS showed real delivered-dose distributions because it uses the measured fluence, a high-resolution detector, and accurate beam modeling. We confirm here that the accuracy and detectability of the delivered dose of the COMPASS system are sufficient for clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D reconstruction; Online verification; Quality assurance; Transmission detector; VMAT

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29532322     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-018-0451-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  14 in total

1.  Experimental validation of a commercial 3D dose verification system for intensity-modulated arc therapies.

Authors:  Ramesh Boggula; Friedlieb Lorenz; Lutz Mueller; Mattias Birkner; Hansjoerg Wertz; Florian Stieler; Volker Steil; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Patient-specific 3D pretreatment and potential 3D online dose verification of Monte Carlo-calculated IMRT prostate treatment plans.

Authors:  Ramesh Boggula; Lennart Jahnke; Hansjoerg Wertz; Frank Lohr; Frederik Wenz
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee.

Authors:  Gary A Ezzell; James M Galvin; Daniel Low; Jatinder R Palta; Isaac Rosen; Michael B Sharpe; Ping Xia; Ying Xiao; Lei Xing; Cedric X Yu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Variations of lung density and geometry on inhomogeneity correction algorithms: a Monte Carlo dosimetric evaluation.

Authors:  James C L Chow; Michael K K Leung; Jake Van Dyk
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators.

Authors:  Eric E Klein; Joseph Hanley; John Bayouth; Fang-Fang Yin; William Simon; Sean Dresser; Christopher Serago; Francisco Aguirre; Lijun Ma; Bijan Arjomandy; Chihray Liu; Carlos Sandin; Todd Holmes
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  BEAM: a Monte Carlo code to simulate radiotherapy treatment units.

Authors:  D W Rogers; B A Faddegon; G X Ding; C M Ma; J We; T R Mackie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Reconstruction of high-resolution 3D dose from matrix measurements: error detection capability of the COMPASS correction kernel method.

Authors:  J Godart; E W Korevaar; R Visser; D J L Wauben; A A Van't Veld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  VMAT QA: measurement-guided 4D dose reconstruction on a patient.

Authors:  Benjamin E Nelms; Daniel Opp; Joshua Robinson; Theresa K Wolf; Geoffrey Zhang; Eduardo Moros; Vladimir Feygelman
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Clinical introduction of a linac head-mounted 2D detector array based quality assurance system in head and neck IMRT.

Authors:  Erik W Korevaar; David J L Wauben; Peter C van der Hulst; Johannes A Langendijk; Aart A Van't Veld
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Validation of a method for in vivo 3D dose reconstruction in SBRT using a new transmission detector.

Authors:  Yuji Nakaguchi; Takeshi Ono; Masato Maruyama; Yoshinobu Shimohigashi; Yudai Kai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  2 in total

1.  DVH analysis using a transmission detector and model-based dose verification system as a comprehensive pretreatment QA tool for VMAT plans: Clinical experience and results.

Authors:  Ahamed B Mohamed Yoosuf; Salem AlShehri; Abdulrahman Alhadab; Mamdooh Alqathami
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.102

2.  Verification of stereotactic radiosurgery plans for multiple brain metastases using a virtual phantom-based procedure.

Authors:  Juan-Francisco Calvo-Ortega; Peter B Greer; Sandra Moragues-Femenía; Miguel Pozo-Massó; Joan Casals-Farran
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2022-07-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.