Literature DB >> 16651019

Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension.

Lyn Frazier1, Katy Carlson, Charles Clifton.   

Abstract

Words, like musical notes, are grouped together into phrases by their rhythmic and durational properties as well as their tonal pitch. This 'prosodic phrasing' affects the understanding of sentences. Many processing studies of prosody have investigated sentences with a single, grammatically required prosodic boundary, which might be interpreted strictly locally, as a signal to end the current syntactic unit. Recent results suggest, however, that the global pattern of prosodic phrasing is what matters in sentence comprehension, not just the occurrence or size of a single local boundary. In this article we claim that the impact of prosodic boundaries depends on the other prosodic choices a speaker has made. We speculate that prosody serves to hold distinct linguistic representations together in memory.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16651019     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  43 in total

1.  The pace of prosodic phrasing couples the listener's cortex to the reader's voice.

Authors:  Mathieu Bourguignon; Xavier De Tiège; Marc Op de Beeck; Noémie Ligot; Philippe Paquier; Patrick Van Bogaert; Serge Goldman; Riitta Hari; Veikko Jousmäki
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The power of the word may reside in the power of affect.

Authors:  Jaak Panksepp
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2007-12-04

3.  Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

Authors:  Ariel N James; Scott H Fraundorf; Eun-Kyung Lee; Duane G Watson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Cortical encoding of acoustic and linguistic rhythms in spoken narratives.

Authors:  Cheng Luo; Nai Ding
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Processing temporary syntactic ambiguity: the effect of contextual bias.

Authors:  Mohamed Taha Mohamed; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Factors in sensory processing of prosody in schizotypal personality disorder: an fMRI experiment.

Authors:  Chandlee C Dickey; Istvan A Morocz; Daniel Minney; Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Martina M Voglmaier; Lawrence P Panych; Usman Khan; Rayna Zacks; Douglas P Terry; Martha E Shenton; Robert W McCarley
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Mandarin-speaking preschoolers' pitch discrimination, prosodic and phonological awareness, and their relation to receptive vocabulary and reading abilities.

Authors:  Wei-Lun Chung; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  Read Writ       Date:  2020-07-20

8.  Bidirectional Relations between Text Reading Prosody and Reading Comprehension in the Upper Primary School Grades: A Longitudinal Perspective.

Authors:  Nathalie J Veenendaal; Margriet A Groen; Ludo Verhoeven
Journal:  Sci Stud Read       Date:  2016-01-08

9.  Prosodic boundary strength: An articulatory and perceptual study.

Authors:  Jelena Krivokapić; Dani Byrd
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2012-05-01

10.  Aging and individual differences in binding during sentence understanding: evidence from temporary and global syntactic attachment ambiguities.

Authors:  Brennan R Payne; Sarah Grison; Xuefei Gao; Kiel Christianson; Daniel G Morrow; Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.