Literature DB >> 19744720

Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer.

Kaspar Rohrer1, Beatrice E Frueh, Rudolf Wälti, Isabelle A Clemetson, Christoph Tappeiner, David Goldblum.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate a new high-resolution noncontact biometer (Lenstar; Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland) using optical low-coherence reflectometry and to compare the clinical measurements with those obtained from the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and the Pachmumeter (Haag-Streit AG).
DESIGN: Exploratory evaluation of diagnostic technology and nonrandomized, prospective clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty subjects (144 eyes) aged 20 to 90 years with cataractous, pseudophakic, aphakic, silicon oil-filled, or normal eyes.
METHODS: Measurements of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal radius (R1 [flattest radius of corneal curvature] and R2 [steep radius, 90 degrees apart from R1]), and axis of the flattest radius (Ax1) obtained with the Lenstar were compared with those obtained with the IOLMaster or Pachmumeter. The results were evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. The differences between both methods were assessed using the paired t test, and its correlation was evaluated by Pearson coefficient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Axial length, CCT, ACD, R1, R2, and Ax1.
RESULTS: The overall mean AL measured with the Lenstar and the IOLMaster was 24.1 mm (r = 0.999). Anterior chamber depth was 3.19 mm (Lenstar) and 3.17 mm (IOLMaster; r = 0.875). Excellent correlations also were found for the corneal radius and the axis of flattest radius (R1, r = 0.927; R2, r = 0.929; and Ax1, r = 0.938). Mean CCT was 0.557 mm (r = 0.978) for both Lenstar and Pachmumeter.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurements with the new Lenstar correlated well with those with the IOLMaster and Pachmumeter in cataractous, pseudophakic, aphakic, silicon oil-filled, and normal eyes. It is an accurate, fast instrument that provides additional information of interest to any cataract or refractive surgeon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19744720     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  33 in total

1.  Comparison of optical low-coherence reflectometry and applanation ultrasound biometry on intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević; Mladen Bušić; Ivan Cima; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Daliborka Miletić
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-18       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Intraobserver and interobserver repeatability of ocular components measurement in cataract eyes using a new optical low coherence reflectometer.

Authors:  Mirjana Bjeloš Rončević; Mladen Bušić; Ivan Cima; Biljana Kuzmanović Elabjer; Damir Bosnar; Daliborka Miletić
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison of anterior segment measurements using rotating Scheimpflug imaging and partial coherence interferometry.

Authors:  Mohammad Soleimani; Hassan Hashemi; Shiva Mehravaran; Mehdi Khabazkhoob; Mohammad Hassan Emamian; Mohammad Shariati; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Agreement analysis of LENSTAR with other techniques of biometry.

Authors:  S Jasvinder; T F Khang; K K S Sarinder; V P Loo; V Subrayan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  [Comparison of IOL-Master 500 vs. Lenstar LS900 concerning the calculation of target refraction: A retrospective analysis].

Authors:  M Stattin; C Zehetner; N E Bechrakis; L Speicher
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.059

6.  Assessment of eye length changes in accommodation using dynamic extended-depth OCT.

Authors:  Yu-Cherng Chang; Keke Liu; Carolina de Freitas; Alex Pham; Florence Cabot; Siobhan Williams; Ethan Adre; Giovanni Gregori; Marco Ruggeri; Sonia H Yoo; Arthur Ho; Jean-Marie Parel; Fabrice Manns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter.

Authors:  Hasan Ali Bayhan; Seray Aslan Bayhan; Izzet Can
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Comparison of keratometric measurements obtained by the Verion Image Guided System with optical biometry and auto-keratorefractometer.

Authors:  Leyla Asena; Sirel Gür Güngör; Ahmet Akman
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Stability of the Barrett True-K formula for intraocular lens power calculation after SMILE in Chinese myopic eyes.

Authors:  Wei Zhu; Feng-Ju Zhang; Yu Li; Yan-Zheng Song
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

10.  Comparison axial length measurements from three biometric instruments in high myopia.

Authors:  Xiao-Gang Wang; Jing Dong; Yu-Lan Pu; Hui-Jun Liu; Qiang Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.