Literature DB >> 19730130

The applicability of Lean and Six Sigma techniques to clinical and translational research.

Sharon A Schweikhart1, Allard E Dembe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lean and Six Sigma are business management strategies commonly used in production industries to improve process efficiency and quality. During the past decade, these process improvement techniques increasingly have been applied outside the manufacturing sector, for example, in health care and in software development. This article concerns the potential use of Lean and Six Sigma in improving the processes involved in clinical and translational research. Improving quality, avoiding delays and errors, and speeding up the time to implementation of biomedical discoveries are prime objectives of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Roadmap for Medical Research and the NIH's Clinical and Translational Science Award program.
METHODS: This article presents a description of the main principles, practices, and methods used in Lean and Six Sigma. Available literature involving applications of Lean and Six Sigma to health care, laboratory science, and clinical and translational research is reviewed. Specific issues concerning the use of these techniques in different phases of translational research are identified.
RESULTS: Examples of Lean and Six Sigma applications that are being planned at a current Clinical and Translational Science Award site are provided, which could potentially be replicated elsewhere. We describe how different process improvement approaches are best adapted for particular translational research phases.
CONCLUSIONS: Lean and Six Sigma process improvement methods are well suited to help achieve NIH's goal of making clinical and translational research more efficient and cost-effective, enhancing the quality of the research, and facilitating the successful adoption of biomedical research findings into practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19730130      PMCID: PMC2835466          DOI: 10.2310/JIM.0b013e3181b91b3a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Investig Med        ISSN: 1081-5589            Impact factor:   2.895


  31 in total

1.  Assessing the impact of total quality management and organizational culture on multiple outcomes of care for coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients.

Authors:  S M Shortell; R H Jones; A W Rademaker; R R Gillies; D S Dranove; E F Hughes; P P Budetti; K S Reynolds; C F Huang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Error-free pathology: applying lean production methods to anatomic pathology.

Authors:  Jennifer L Condel; David T Sharbaugh; Stephen S Raab
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.935

3.  Six sigma project reduces analytical errors in an automated lab.

Authors:  Nancy Riebling; Laurel Tria
Journal:  MLO Med Lab Obs       Date:  2005-06

4.  Practice-based research--"Blue Highways" on the NIH roadmap.

Authors:  John M Westfall; James Mold; Lyle Fagnan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 5.  Helping science to succeed: improving processes in R&D.

Authors:  Andreas Sewing; Toby Winchester; Pauline Carnell; David Hampton; Wilma Keighley
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 7.851

6.  A case study of lean drug discovery: from project driven research to innovation studios and process factories.

Authors:  Fredrik Ullman; Roman Boutellier
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 7.851

7.  Nomenclature in translational research.

Authors:  Ian D Graham; Jacqueline Tetroe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  A report card on continuous quality improvement.

Authors:  D Blumenthal; C M Kilo
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations.

Authors:  G Laffel; D Blumenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-11-24       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.

Authors:  Nancy S Sung; William F Crowley; Myron Genel; Patricia Salber; Lewis Sandy; Louis M Sherwood; Stephen B Johnson; Veronica Catanese; Hugh Tilson; Kenneth Getz; Elaine L Larson; David Scheinberg; E Albert Reece; Harold Slavkin; Adrian Dobs; Jack Grebb; Rick A Martinez; Allan Korn; David Rimoin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  30 in total

1.  Academic Medical Center R&D: A Call for Creating an Operational Research Infrastructure within the Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Devin M Mann; Rachel Hess
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 2.  Critical appraisal of translational research models for suitability in performance assessment of cancer centers.

Authors:  Abinaya Rajan; Richard Sullivan; Suzanne Bakker; Wim H van Harten
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012

3.  Improving Initiation and Tracking of Research Projects at an Academic Health Center: A Case Study.

Authors:  Susanne Schmidt; Martin Goros; Helen M Parsons; Can Saygin; Hung-Da Wan; Paula K Shireman; Jonathan A L Gelfond
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  Perspectives of Clinicians, Staff, and Veterans in Transitioning Veterans from non-VA Hospitals to Primary Care in a Single VA Healthcare System.

Authors:  Roman A Ayele; Emily Lawrence; Marina McCreight; Kelty Fehling; Russell E Glasgow; Borsika A Rabin; Robert E Burke; Catherine Battaglia
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 2.960

5.  Development of research priorities in paediatric pain and palliative care.

Authors:  Christina Liossi; Anna-Karenia Anderson; Richard F Howard
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2016-09-16

6.  Re-orientation of clinical research in traumatic brain injury: report of an international workshop on comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; Hester F Lingsma; Jose A Pineda; M Elizabeth Sandel; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Quantifying complexity in translational research: an integrated approach.

Authors:  David A Munoz; Harriet Black Nembhard; Jennifer L Kraschnewski
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2014

8.  Using the Lean Six Sigma Methodology to Reduce Mouse Cage Sanitation Time for Animal Care and Use Programs.

Authors:  Jamison V Kovach; Ansupa Dash
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  An academic-health service partnership in nursing: lessons from the field.

Authors:  Bradi B Granger; Janet Prvu-Bettger; Julia Aucoin; Mary Ann Fuchs; Pamela H Mitchell; Diane Holditch-Davis; Deborah Roth; Robert M Califf; Catherine L Gilliss
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.176

10.  The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrea M Denicoff; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Stephen S Grubbs; Suanna S Bruinooge; Robert L Comis; Peggy Devine; David M Dilts; Michelle E Duff; Jean G Ford; Steven Joffe; Lidia Schapira; Kevin P Weinfurt; Margo Michaels; Derek Raghavan; Ellen S Richmond; Robin Zon; Terrance L Albrecht; Michael A Bookman; Afshin Dowlati; Rebecca A Enos; Mona N Fouad; Marjorie Good; William J Hicks; Patrick J Loehrer; Alan P Lyss; Steven N Wolff; Debra M Wujcik; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.