Literature DB >> 25417380

Quantifying complexity in translational research: an integrated approach.

David A Munoz, Harriet Black Nembhard, Jennifer L Kraschnewski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to quantify complexity in translational research. The impact of major operational steps and technical requirements is calculated with respect to their ability to accelerate moving new discoveries into clinical practice. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A three-phase integrated quality function deployment (QFD) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was used to quantify complexity in translational research. A case study in obesity was used to usability.
FINDINGS: Generally, the evidence generated was valuable for understanding various components in translational research. Particularly, the authors found that collaboration networks, multidisciplinary team capacity and community engagement are crucial for translating new discoveries into practice. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: As the method is mainly based on subjective opinion, some argue that the results may be biased. However, a consistency ratio is calculated and used as a guide to subjectivity. Alternatively, a larger sample may be incorporated to reduce bias. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The integrated QFD-AHP framework provides evidence that could be helpful to generate agreement, develop guidelines, allocate resources wisely, identify benchmarks and enhance collaboration among similar projects. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Current conceptual models in translational research provide little or no clue to assess complexity. The proposed method aimed to fill this gap. Additionally, the literature review includes various features that have not been explored in translational research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25417380      PMCID: PMC4269298          DOI: 10.1108/ijhcqa-01-2014-0002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur        ISSN: 0952-6862


  18 in total

1.  Integrating patients' views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences.

Authors:  Marion Danner; J Marjan Hummel; Fabian Volz; Jeannette G van Manen; Beate Wiegard; Charalabos-Markos Dintsios; Hilda Bastian; Andreas Gerber; Maarten J Ijzerman
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  The meaning of translational research and why it matters.

Authors:  Steven H Woolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The "3T's" road map to transform US health care: the "how" of high-quality care.

Authors:  Denise Dougherty; Patrick H Conway
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) Consortium and the translational research model.

Authors:  Alexander A Kon
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Evaluating translational research: a process marker model.

Authors:  William Trochim; Cathleen Kane; Mark J Graham; Harold A Pincus
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.689

6.  Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for examining healthcare professionals' assessments of risk factors. The relative importance of risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older people.

Authors:  L Pecchia; P A Bath; N Pendleton; M Bracale
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 2.176

7.  The applicability of Lean and Six Sigma techniques to clinical and translational research.

Authors:  Sharon A Schweikhart; Allard E Dembe
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  The prioritization of cancer antigens: a national cancer institute pilot project for the acceleration of translational research.

Authors:  Martin A Cheever; James P Allison; Andrea S Ferris; Olivera J Finn; Benjamin M Hastings; Toby T Hecht; Ira Mellman; Sheila A Prindiville; Jaye L Viner; Louis M Weiner; Lynn M Matrisian
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  The continuum of translation research in genomic medicine: how can we accelerate the appropriate integration of human genome discoveries into health care and disease prevention?

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Marta Gwinn; Paula W Yoon; Nicole Dowling; Cynthia A Moore; Linda Bradley
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Applying systems engineering principles in improving health care delivery.

Authors:  Renata Kopach-Konrad; Mark Lawley; Mike Criswell; Imran Hasan; Santanu Chakraborty; Joseph Pekny; Bradley N Doebbeling
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  4 in total

1.  Measuring vaccination willingness in response to COVID-19 using a multi-criteria-decision making method.

Authors:  Adnan Sarwar; Naima Nazar; Nimra Nazar; Alia Qadir
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  The Current Trend of the Translational Research Paradigm.

Authors:  Paul J Choi; R Shane Tubbs; Rod J Oskouian
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-03-19

3.  A large National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre facilitates impactful cross-disciplinary and collaborative translational research publications and research collaboration networks: a bibliometric evaluation study.

Authors:  Vasiliki Kiparoglou; Laurence A Brown; Helen McShane; Keith M Channon; Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 4.  Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting.

Authors:  Katharina Schmidt; Ines Aumann; Ines Hollander; Kathrin Damm; J-Matthias Graf von der Schulenburg
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.