Literature DB >> 2810623

The case for using industrial quality management science in health care organizations.

G Laffel1, D Blumenthal.   

Abstract

In an effort to provide health care of optimal quality, providers traditionally assess or measure performance and then assure that it conforms to standards. In cases where performance fails to conform, providers attempt to modify or improve physician behavior. The analytic scope of this traditional paradigm may not be broad enough to allow modern health care organizations to provide optimal care. At a theoretical and practical level, many conceptual limitations inherent in the traditional approach are addressed in modern industrial quality science. A fundamental principle of industrial quality control is the recognition, analysis, and elimination of variation. Based on rigorous analysis of variation in outcomes and processes, industrial quality experts have developed principles and techniques for quality improvement. Health care organizations may well make important advances in the quality of care and service through the application of these principles and techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2810623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  60 in total

1.  Process models for telehealth: an industrial approach to quality management of distant medical practice.

Authors:  H Kangarloo; J D Dionisio; U Sinha; D Johnson; R K Taira
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  The best of times and worst of times.

Authors:  K C Stange
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  An industrial process view of information delivery to support clinical decision making: implications for systems design and process measures.

Authors:  R B Elson; J G Faughnan; D P Connelly
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  The meaning of quality in health care: a conceptual analysis.

Authors:  P P M Harteloh
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2003-09

5.  Continuous quality improvement in infectious diseases.

Authors:  J Conly; S Shafran
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1993-01

6.  Systematic design of healthcare processes.

Authors:  P E Plsek
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-03

7.  Medical accountability and the criminal law: New Zealand vs the world.

Authors:  A M Smith; A Merry
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  1996-02

8.  Changing systems of external monitoring of quality of health care in the United States.

Authors:  N J Wareham
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-06

Review 9.  Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Richard P T M Grol; Marije C Bosch; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Martin P Eccles; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  Does quality improvement work? Evaluation of the Organ Donation Breakthrough Collaborative.

Authors:  David H Howard; Laura A Siminoff; Virginia McBride; Monica Lin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.