Literature DB >> 24130252

The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations.

Andrea M Denicoff1, Worta McCaskill-Stevens, Stephen S Grubbs, Suanna S Bruinooge, Robert L Comis, Peggy Devine, David M Dilts, Michelle E Duff, Jean G Ford, Steven Joffe, Lidia Schapira, Kevin P Weinfurt, Margo Michaels, Derek Raghavan, Ellen S Richmond, Robin Zon, Terrance L Albrecht, Michael A Bookman, Afshin Dowlati, Rebecca A Enos, Mona N Fouad, Marjorie Good, William J Hicks, Patrick J Loehrer, Alan P Lyss, Steven N Wolff, Debra M Wujcik, Neal J Meropol.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Many challenges to clinical trial accrual exist, resulting in studies with inadequate enrollment and potentially delaying answers to important scientific and clinical questions.
METHODS: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) cosponsored the Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: Science and Solutions on April 29-30, 2010 to examine the state of accrual science related to patient/community, physician/provider, and site/organizational influences, and identify new interventions to facilitate clinical trial enrollment. The symposium featured breakout sessions, plenary sessions, and a poster session including 100 abstracts. Among the 358 attendees were clinical investigators, researchers of accrual strategies, research administrators, nurses, research coordinators, patient advocates, and educators. A bibliography of the accrual literature in these three major areas was provided to participants in advance of the meeting. After the symposium, the literature in these areas was revisited to determine if the symposium recommendations remained relevant within the context of the current literature.
RESULTS: Few rigorously conducted studies have tested interventions to address challenges to clinical trials accrual. Attendees developed recommendations for improving accrual and identified priority areas for future accrual research at the patient/community, physician/provider, and site/organizational levels. Current literature continues to support the symposium recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: A combination of approaches addressing both the multifactorial nature of accrual challenges and the characteristics of the target population may be needed to improve accrual to cancer clinical trials. Recommendations for best practices and for future research developed from the symposium are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24130252      PMCID: PMC3825288          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  154 in total

1.  The leadership team: complementary strengths or conflicting agendas?

Authors:  Stephen A Miles; Michael D Watkins
Journal:  Harv Bus Rev       Date:  2007-04

2.  ResearchMatch: a national registry to recruit volunteers for clinical research.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Kirstin W Scott; Laurie Lebo; Niknik Hassan; Chad Lightner; Jill Pulley
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Increasing minority patient participation in cancer clinical trials using oncology nurse navigation.

Authors:  Dennis Ricky Holmes; Jacquelyn Major; Doris Efosi Lyonga; Rebecca Simone Alleyne; Sheilah Marie Clayton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Accrual experience of National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group phase III trials activated from 2000 to 2007.

Authors:  Edward L Korn; Boris Freidlin; Margaret Mooney; Jeffrey S Abrams
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review.

Authors:  Patrina H Y Caldwell; Sana Hamilton; Alvin Tan; Jonathan C Craig
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Overcoming barriers to cancer clinical trial accrual: impact of a mass media campaign.

Authors:  Ari Umutyan; Christine Chiechi; Laurel A Beckett; Debora A Paterniti; Corinne Turrell; David R Gandara; Sharon W Davis; Ted Wun; Moon S Chen; Primo N Lara
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  Are cancer-related decision aids effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mary Ann O'Brien; Timothy J Whelan; Miguel Villasis-Keever; Amiram Gafni; Cathy Charles; Robin Roberts; Susan Schiff; Wenjie Cai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Challenges of recruitment of breast cancer survivors to a randomized clinical trial for osteoporosis prevention.

Authors:  Carol D Ott; Janice J Twiss; Nancy L Waltman; Gloria J Gross; Ada M Lindsey
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.592

9.  Participation in surgical oncology clinical trials: gender-, race/ethnicity-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  John H Stewart; Alain G Bertoni; Jennifer L Staten; Edward A Levine; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  A statewide community cancer center videoconferencing program.

Authors:  D Dickson-Witmer; Nicholas J Petrelli; D R Witmer; M England; G Witkin; T Manzone; J Napoletano; P Strusowski; J Spellman; D Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  58 in total

1.  Enrolling Minority and Underserved Populations in Cancer Clinical Research.

Authors:  Sherrie F Wallington; Chiranjeev Dash; Vanessa B Sheppard; Tawara D Goode; Bridget A Oppong; Everett E Dodson; Rhonda N Hamilton; Lucile L Adams-Campbell
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Prior cancer does not adversely affect survival in locally advanced lung cancer: A national SEER-medicare analysis.

Authors:  Andrew L Laccetti; Sandi L Pruitt; Lei Xuan; Ethan A Halm; David E Gerber
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Effect of prior cancer on outcomes in advanced lung cancer: implications for clinical trial eligibility and accrual.

Authors:  Andrew L Laccetti; Sandi L Pruitt; Lei Xuan; Ethan A Halm; David E Gerber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  The imperative to address the cost of oncology care.

Authors:  Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Barriers to accrual and enrollment in brain tumor trials.

Authors:  Eudocia Q Lee; Ugonma N Chukwueke; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper; John F de Groot; Jose Pablo Leone; Terri S Armstrong; Susan M Chang; David Arons; Kathy Oliver; Kay Verble; Al Musella; Nicole Willmarth; Brian M Alexander; Amanda Bates; Lisa Doherty; Evanthia Galanis; Sarah Gaffey; Thomas Halkin; Bret E Friday; Maryam Fouladi; Nancy U Lin; David Macdonald; Minesh P Mehta; Marta Penas-Prado; Michael A Vogelbaum; Solmaz Sahebjam; David Sandak; Martin van den Bent; Michael Weller; David A Reardon; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 12.300

6.  Conceptual Model for Accrual to Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Simon J Craddock Lee; Caitlin C Murphy; Ann M Geiger; David E Gerber; John V Cox; Rasmi Nair; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The relationship between eligibility criteria and adverse events in randomized controlled trials of hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  A Statler; T Radivoyevitch; C Siebenaller; A T Gerds; M Kalaycio; E Kodish; S Mukherjee; C Cheng; M A Sekeres
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 11.528

8.  Recruiting Endometrial Cancer Survivors to Studies Examining Lifestyle Behaviors and Quality of Life: Challenges Faced and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Alexander R Lucas; Brian C Focht; David E Cohn; Maryanna D Klatt; Janet Buckworth
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Randomized Trials of Proton Therapy: Why They Are at Risk, Proposed Solutions, and Implications for Evaluating Advanced Technologies to Diagnose and Treat Cancer.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Andrea Denicoff; Jeffrey Buchsbaum
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Priorities for Rural Lymphoma Survivors: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Lillian Chen; Jackelyn B Payne; Kaylin V Dance; Conner B Imbody; Cathy D Ho; Amy A Ayers; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2019-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.