Literature DB >> 31319901

Using the Lean Six Sigma Methodology to Reduce Mouse Cage Sanitation Time for Animal Care and Use Programs.

Jamison V Kovach1, Ansupa Dash2.   

Abstract

Although efficient sanitization is a high priority for Animal Care and Use Programs (ACUP), the cage sanitation process for animals used in biomedical research can be labor-intensive. To increase the efficiency of sanitation services provided by ACUP, the current project used the Lean Six Sigma methodology to reduce the time to sanitize mouse cages by implementing countermeasures to reduce causes of waste within this process for the Animal Care Operations (ACO) group at a leading public research university. Lean Six Sigma was selected for use in this project given its goal to make organizations' routine operations flow as smoothly and efficiently as possible and its applicability to biomedical and research settings as discussed in the literature. Through observation of the ACO's existing mouse cage sanitation process and brainstorming sessions with the ACO staff, the existing process was mapped, a baseline measurement of the current process performance was established, the process was analyzed to identify potential causes of waste, and appropriate countermeasures were implemented to improve the process. These countermeasures involved actions specifically targeted at reducing process delays, which included implementing new procedures, clarified schedules, and visual controls. As a result of this project, ACO's average mouse cage sanitation process cycle time was reduced by 35 min, and the time saved was reinvested within the ACO to provide technicians additional time to complete other valuable tasks and thus support animal research endeavors at this university.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31319901      PMCID: PMC6774460          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  10 in total

1.  A guide to the new ARENA/OLAW IACUC guidebook.

Authors:  Marky Pitts
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.625

Review 2.  Helping science to succeed: improving processes in R&D.

Authors:  Andreas Sewing; Toby Winchester; Pauline Carnell; David Hampton; Wilma Keighley
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  A case study of lean drug discovery: from project driven research to innovation studios and process factories.

Authors:  Fredrik Ullman; Roman Boutellier
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 7.851

4.  Improving animal research facility operations through the application of lean principles.

Authors:  Nabeel Khan; Brian M Umrysh
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008-06-01

5.  Training veterinary care technicians and husbandry staff improves animal care.

Authors:  Cynthia R Lockworth; Suzanne L Craig; Jun Liu; Peggy T Tinkey
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  A shift in designing cage-washing operations.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Zynda
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 12.625

7.  A Redesign Approach for Improving Animal Care Services for Researchers.

Authors:  Orighomisan Okpe; Jamison V Kovach
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  The applicability of Lean and Six Sigma techniques to clinical and translational research.

Authors:  Sharon A Schweikhart; Allard E Dembe
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  The a3 problem solving report: a 10-step scientific method to execute performance improvements in an academic research vivarium.

Authors:  James A Bassuk; Ida M Washington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Iterative development of visual control systems in a research vivarium.

Authors:  James A Bassuk; Ida M Washington
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Environmental Enrichment for Rats and Mice Housed in Laboratories: A Metareview.

Authors:  Anna S Ratuski; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 2.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.