PURPOSE: The aim of this analysis was to compare the biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates in low-risk prostate cancer patients treated at two centers of excellence using different approaches: seed brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 919 low-risk prostate cancer patients, treated from 1998-2008, were identified in the two databases. In Utrecht, 667 patients received I-125 BT applying a dose of 144 Gy. In Vienna, 252 patients were treated with EBRT, applying a local dose of 70 Gy in 82 patients and 74 Gy in 170 patients. bNED rates (Phoenix definition) were assessed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 46 months (range 1-148 months). The 5-year actuarial bNED rates were 94% for BT patients and 88% for EBRT patients (p = 0.002)-84% for patients receiving 70 Gy and 91% for patients receiving 74 Gy, respectively. In the univariate analysis, patients receiving 70 Gy showed significantly worse outcome compared to BT (p = 0.001) and a difference close to significance compared to 74 Gy (p = 0.06). In the multivariate analysis including tumor stage, Gleason score, initial PSA, hormonal therapy, and dose, patients receiving 70 Gy EBRT showed significantly worse bNED rates compared to BT patients. CONCLUSION: Low-risk prostate cancer patients receiving 74 Gy by EBRT show comparable biochemical control rates to patients receiving seed brachytherapy, whereas patients receiving 70 Gy show significantly worse outcome.
PURPOSE: The aim of this analysis was to compare the biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates in low-risk prostate cancerpatients treated at two centers of excellence using different approaches: seed brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 919 low-risk prostate cancerpatients, treated from 1998-2008, were identified in the two databases. In Utrecht, 667 patients received I-125 BT applying a dose of 144 Gy. In Vienna, 252 patients were treated with EBRT, applying a local dose of 70 Gy in 82 patients and 74 Gy in 170 patients. bNED rates (Phoenix definition) were assessed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 46 months (range 1-148 months). The 5-year actuarial bNED rates were 94% for BT patients and 88% for EBRT patients (p = 0.002)-84% for patients receiving 70 Gy and 91% for patients receiving 74 Gy, respectively. In the univariate analysis, patients receiving 70 Gy showed significantly worse outcome compared to BT (p = 0.001) and a difference close to significance compared to 74 Gy (p = 0.06). In the multivariate analysis including tumor stage, Gleason score, initial PSA, hormonal therapy, and dose, patients receiving 70 Gy EBRT showed significantly worse bNED rates compared to BT patients. CONCLUSION: Low-risk prostate cancerpatients receiving 74 Gy by EBRT show comparable biochemical control rates to patients receiving seed brachytherapy, whereas patients receiving 70 Gy show significantly worse outcome.
Authors: Stephanie T H Peeters; Wilma D Heemsbergen; Peter C M Koper; Wim L J van Putten; Annerie Slot; Michel F H Dielwart; Johannes M G Bonfrer; Luca Incrocci; Joos V Lebesque Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gregor Goldner; Samir Sljivic; Renee Oismueller; Johanna Salinger; Michael Mittermüller; Tanja Langsenlehner; Walter Harder; Gerhard Kametriser; Helmut Eiter; Elisabeth Nechvile Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Michael Pinkawa; Marc D Piroth; Richard Holy; Victoria Djukic; Jens Klotz; Barbara Krenkel; Michael J Eble Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2011-07-25 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: John E Sylvester; John C Blasko; Peter D Grimm; Robert Meier; Judith A Malmgren Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2003-11-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Patrick A Kupelian; Louis Potters; Deepak Khuntia; Jay P Ciezki; Chandana A Reddy; Alwyn M Reuther; Thomas P Carlson; Eric A Klein Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: E Le Fur; J P Malhaire; D Baverez; F Delage; M A Perrouin-Verbe; F Schlurmann; S Guerif; G Fournier; O Pradier; A Valeri Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: M Pinkawa; M D Piroth; R Holy; N Escobar-Corral; M Caffaro; V Djukic; J Klotz; M J Eble Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-08-31 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Simon Zuber; Susan Weiß; Dieter Baaske; Michael Schöpe; Simon Stevens; Stephan Bodis; Daniel R Zwahlen Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2015-02-22 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Paul Martin Putora; Ludwig Plasswilm; Wolf Seelentag; Johann Schiefer; Patrick Markart; Hans-Peter Schmid; Daniel Engeler Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Matthias Moll; Andreas Renner; Christian Kirisits; Christopher Paschen; Alexandru Zaharie; Gregor Goldner Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2021-08-05 Impact factor: 3.621