Literature DB >> 21347637

Ferumoxtran-10 MR lymphography for target definition and follow-up in a patient undergoing image-guided, dose-escalated radiotherapy of lymph nodes upon PSA relapse.

Anja M Weidner1, Emile N J Th van Lin, Dietmar J Dinter, Tom Rozema, Stefan O Schoenberg, Frederik Wenz, Jelle O Barentsz, Frank Lohr.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluation of the lymph node situation in patients with prostate cancer is essential for effective radiotherapy. Using magnet resonance imaging (MRI) of the lymph nodes with ferumoxtran-10 (MR lymphography), it is possible to detect lymph node metastasis. We present our initial experience with ferumoxtran-10 MR lymphography as the basis for image-guided, dose-escalated lymph node radiotherapy and for early follow-up after radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A patient with suspicion for lymph node metastasis after radical prostatectomy was examined with MR lymphography with the lymph node-specific contrast media ferumoxtran-10. Radiotherapy was performed as intensity-modulated radiotherapy with a total dose of 44 Gy to the whole lymphatic drainage, 60 Gy to the area of affected lymph nodes, 71 Gy to the prostate bed, and 75 Gy to the anastomosis region. 8 weeks after completion of radiotherapy, a follow-up MR lymphography with ferumoxtran-10 was performed.
RESULTS: In the first MRI with ferumoxtran-10, 5 metastatic lymph nodes were found in the iliac region. The scan 8 weeks postradiotherapy no longer showed lymph nodes suspicious for metastases. PSA (prostate-specific antigen) decreased from 2.06 ng/ml pretherapeutically to 0.02 ng/ml at 2 weeks after treatment and was no longer detectable at 8 months after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Lymph node staging with ferumoxtran-10 and subsequent dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy led to the elimination of positive lymph nodes and a decrease in the PSA value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21347637     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-010-2195-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  30 in total

Review 1.  [Lymph node positive prostate carcinoma. A case for radiotherapy].

Authors:  U Steiner; T Wiegel; K Miller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Ten-year outcomes for pathologic node-positive patients treated in RTOG 75-06.

Authors:  G E Hanks; J Buzydlowski; W T Sause; B Emami; P Rubin; J A Parsons; A H Russell; R W Byhardt; J D Earle; M V Pilepich
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy improves lymph node coverage and dose to critical structures compared with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alice Wang-Chesebro; Ping Xia; Joy Coleman; Clayton Akazawa; Mack Roach
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Pelvic node dissection in prostate cancer: extended, limited, or not at all?

Authors:  Matthew Eric Hyndman; Jeffrey K Mullins; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.309

5.  Whole pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer using 3D conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jonathan B Ashman; Michael J Zelefsky; Margie S Hunt; Steven A Leibel; Zvi Fuks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  High-dose intensity modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: early toxicity and biochemical outcome in 772 patients.

Authors:  Michael J Zelefsky; Zvi Fuks; Margie Hunt; Yoshiya Yamada; Christine Marion; C Clifton Ling; Howard Amols; E S Venkatraman; Steven A Leibel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Pelvic lymph node topography for radiotherapy treatment planning from ferumoxtran-10 contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Robert Dinniwell; Philip Chan; Gregory Czarnota; Masoom A Haider; Kartik Jhaveri; Michael Jewett; Anthony Fyles; David Jaffray; Michael Milosevic
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413.

Authors:  M Roach; M DeSilvio; C Lawton; V Uhl; M Machtay; M J Seider; M Rotman; C Jones; S O Asbell; R K Valicenti; S Han; C R Thomas; W S Shipley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Radiotherapy in lymph node-positive prostate cancer patients - a potential cure? Single institutional experience regarding outcome and side effects.

Authors:  Gregor Goldner; Richard Pötter
Journal:  Front Radiat Ther Oncol       Date:  2008

Review 10.  Pelvic lymph node irradiation for prostate cancer: who, why, and when?

Authors:  Dian Wang; Colleen Lawton
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.934

View more
  8 in total

1.  [Image-guided radiation therapy. Paradigm change in radiation therapy].

Authors:  F Wenz; C Belka; M Reiser; S O Schönberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  [Image-guided radiation therapy].

Authors:  J Boda-Heggemann; M Guckenberger; U Ganswindt; C Belka; H Wertz; M Blessing; F Wenz; M Fuss; F Lohr
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Toxicity and outcome of pelvic IMRT for node-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  A-C Müller; J Lütjens; M Alber; F Eckert; M Bamberg; D Schilling; C Belka; U Ganswindt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  [Multiparametric prostate MRI for follow-up monitoring after radiation therapy].

Authors:  A M Weidner; D J Dinter; M Bohrer; M Sertdemir; D Hausmann; F Wenz; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Lymphotropic nanoparticle-enhanced MRI in prostate cancer: value and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Ansje S Fortuin; Robert Jan Smeenk; Hanneke J M Meijer; Alfred J Witjes; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 6.  Molecular and functional imaging for detection of lymph node metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ansje Fortuin; Maarten de Rooij; Patrik Zamecnik; Uwe Haberkorn; Jelle Barentsz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxides for metastatic lymph node detection: back on the block.

Authors:  Ansje S Fortuin; Roger Brüggemann; Janine van der Linden; Ilia Panfilov; Bas Israël; Tom W J Scheenen; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-04-06

Review 8.  Current concepts in clinical radiation oncology.

Authors:  Michael Orth; Kirsten Lauber; Maximilian Niyazi; Anna A Friedl; Minglun Li; Cornelius Maihöfer; Lars Schüttrumpf; Anne Ernst; Olivier M Niemöller; Claus Belka
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 1.925

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.