Literature DB >> 19702351

Endovenous thermal ablation of superficial venous insufficiency of the lower extremity: single-center experience with 3000 limbs treated in a 7-year period.

Rajagopalan Ravi1, Edwina A Trayler, Deborah A Barrett, Edward B Diethrich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that endovenous thermal ablation is not only effective and safe but also a durable treatment in patients with symptomatic varicose veins.
METHODS: From February 2002 to February 2009, 2354 patients (1836 women; mean age 53 years, range 15-95) with symptomatic varicose veins in 3000 limbs underwent endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The majority of treated vessels were the great saphenous veins (GSV; 2619, 87.3%); 269 (8.9%) small saphenous veins (SSV) and 112 (3.8%) accessory saphenous veins (ASV) were also treated, all in outpatient procedures under local intra-compartmental anesthesia. An ultrasound evaluation was performed within 2 weeks of the procedure to evaluate vein occlusion, vein wall thickness, and clot extension into the deep vein. In a long-term evaluation involving the first 165 patients treated from February 2002 to January of 2003, 105 (64%) patients [126 (67%) of the 188 eligible limbs] were followed annually with clinical evaluation, duplex ultrasound, and symptom/satisfaction assessment over a mean 6.7 years.
RESULTS: Treatment of 3000 limbs involved the use of EVLA in 2841 (2460 GSVs, 269 SSVs, and 112 ASVs) and RFA in 159 GSVs. Post-procedure duplex ultrasound found 57 (2.0%) veins recanalized or incompletely occluded [51 (2%) treated with EVLA and 6 (3.7%) with RFA] in patients treated for GSV or ASV incompetence. In the 269 SSVs treated (all with EVLA), 18 (6.7%) limbs demonstrated incomplete occlusion. Overall, both EVLA and RFA procedures were well tolerated, with minimal complications. In the longitudinal assessment of the 105 patients (126 limbs) participating in annual follow-up for a mean 6.7 years, the overall rate of satisfaction, symptom relief, and absence of varicosities was 86%.
CONCLUSION: Endovenous ablation of saphenous vein has proven to be an effective, safe, and very durable procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19702351     DOI: 10.1583/09-2750.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  10 in total

1.  Study on the Long-Term Results of Endovenous Laser Ablation for Treating Varicose Veins.

Authors:  Seung Je Go; Byung Sun Cho; Yun Su Mun; Yoon Jung Kang; Hye Young Ahn
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2015-07-10

2.  Single-visit endovenous laser treatment and tributary procedures for symptomatic great saphenous varicose veins.

Authors:  L S Alder; M A Rahi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  A novel endovenous laser ablation strategy of treatment of greater saphenous vein varicosities with difficult wire placement.

Authors:  Yan Liang; Yusheng Jia; Zhidong Zhang; Futian Xu; Qian Yang; Jianzhang Yan; Dengpeng Gao; Liheng Liu; Ruijian Zhang; Yubo Guo; Qingfu Zhang; Yong Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

4.  Different management options for primary varicose veins in females: A prospective study.

Authors:  Ahmed Mousa; Mohamed El Azzazi; Mai A Elkalla
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2019-05-20

5.  Anterior accessory great saphenous vein as a cause of postoperative recurrence of veins after radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Yrij Svidersky; Volodymyr Goshchynsky; Bogdan Migenko; Liudmyla Migenko; Oleg Pyatnychka
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2022-04

Review 6.  Is radiofrequency ablation of varicose veins a valuable option? A systematic review of the literature with a cost analysis.

Authors:  Thomas G Poder; Jean-François Fisette; Suzanne K Bédard; Marc-Antoine Despatis
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Mid-Term Report on the Safety and Effectiveness of Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation for Varicose Veins.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Tamura; Toshiyuki Maruyama
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2017-12-25

8.  CASS (CyanoAcrylate closure versus Surgical Stripping for incompetent saphenous veins) study: a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes after cyanoacrylate closure and surgical stripping for the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins.

Authors:  Sungsin Cho; Hyung Sub Park; Taeseung Lee; Seung Jae Byun; Woo-Sung Yun; Shin-Seok Yang; Hyangkyoung Kim; Woo-Shik Kim; Jin Hyun Joh; In Mok Jung
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Factors associated with recurrence of varicose veins after thermal ablation: results of the recurrent veins after thermal ablation study.

Authors:  R G Bush; P Bush; J Flanagan; R Fritz; T Gueldner; J Koziarski; K McMullen; G Zumbro
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-27

10.  Mechanochemical endovenous Ablation versus RADiOfrequeNcy Ablation in the treatment of primary great saphenous vein incompetence (MARADONA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ramon R J P van Eekeren; Doeke Boersma; Suzanne Holewijn; Anco Vahl; Jean Paul p m de Vries; Clark J Zeebregts; Michel M P J Reijnen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.