Yan Liang1, Yusheng Jia2, Zhidong Zhang3, Futian Xu4, Qian Yang5, Jianzhang Yan4, Dengpeng Gao4, Liheng Liu4, Ruijian Zhang4, Yubo Guo4, Qingfu Zhang1, Yong Li3. 1. Microcirculation Center, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University China. 2. Department of Surgery, The Second Hospital of Yutian County in Hebei Province China. 3. Third Department of General Surgery, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University China. 4. Department of General Surgery, People's Hospital of Langfang City China. 5. Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University China.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the efficacy and early postoperative morbidity of a novel endovenous laser ablation (IEVLA) strategy of treatment of the great saphenous vein (GSV) with difficulty of wire placement. METHODS:Sixty patients with serious GSV incompetence in 73 limbs were randomized into two treatment groups: Group 1 underwent traditional endovenous laser ablation (TEVLA) surgery and group 2 received IEVLA. Local pain, ecchymosis, induration, paraesthesia in treated regions, thrombotic diseases, vein diameter, treated vein length, delivered energy, operation duration, success rate in placement of the laser fiber and venous clinical severity (VCS) scores were recorded for both group. Follow-up were conducted on the 2nd day, 7th day, and 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 6th month postoperatively. RESULTS: In group 1, induration was present in 18 cases, ecchymosis in 19, paraesthesia in 9, pulmonary embolism (PE) in 1 case, and deep vein thrombus (DVT) in 3. While in group 2, induration present in 29, ecchymosis in 23, paraesthesia in 17 with and no patients were complicated with PE or DVT. Although no difference in improvement of VCS score existed between the two groups at each follow-up time point, group 2 had significantly shorter operation time and higher success rate (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION:IEVLA is a more effective and safe technique for treatment of serious GSV varicosities with difficulty of wire placement.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To investigate the efficacy and early postoperative morbidity of a novel endovenous laser ablation (IEVLA) strategy of treatment of the great saphenous vein (GSV) with difficulty of wire placement. METHODS: Sixty patients with serious GSV incompetence in 73 limbs were randomized into two treatment groups: Group 1 underwent traditional endovenous laser ablation (TEVLA) surgery and group 2 received IEVLA. Local pain, ecchymosis, induration, paraesthesia in treated regions, thrombotic diseases, vein diameter, treated vein length, delivered energy, operation duration, success rate in placement of the laser fiber and venous clinical severity (VCS) scores were recorded for both group. Follow-up were conducted on the 2nd day, 7th day, and 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 6th month postoperatively. RESULTS: In group 1, induration was present in 18 cases, ecchymosis in 19, paraesthesia in 9, pulmonary embolism (PE) in 1 case, and deep vein thrombus (DVT) in 3. While in group 2, induration present in 29, ecchymosis in 23, paraesthesia in 17 with and no patients were complicated with PE or DVT. Although no difference in improvement of VCS score existed between the two groups at each follow-up time point, group 2 had significantly shorter operation time and higher success rate (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: IEVLA is a more effective and safe technique for treatment of serious GSV varicosities with difficulty of wire placement.
Entities:
Keywords:
Endovenous laser ablation; great saphenous vein; varicose veins
Authors: S Manfrini; V Gasbarro; G Danielsson; L Norgren; J G Chandler; A F Lennox; Z A Zarka; A N Nicolaides Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Anil P Hingorani; Enrico Ascher; Natalia Markevich; Richard W Schutzer; Sreedhar Kallakuri; Alexander Hou; Suresh Nahata; William Yorkovich; Theresa Jacob Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Andreas Fiebig; Petra Krusche; Andreas Wolf; Michael Krawczak; Birgitt Timm; Susanna Nikolaus; Norbert Frings; Stefan Schreiber Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2010-03-31 Impact factor: 4.132