Literature DB >> 18709430

Lateral retinacular release rates in mobile- versus fixed-bearing TKA.

Charles C Yang1, Lee A McFadden, Douglas A Dennis, Raymond H Kim, Adrija Sharma.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Controversy exists as to whether bearing mobility facilitates centralization of the extensor mechanism after TKA. To assess the incidence of lateral retinacular release, we retrospectively reviewed 1318 consecutive primary TKAs (1032 patients) performed by one surgeon using either a rotating-platform bearing (940) or a fixed bearing (378) from the same implant system. The selection of a fixed- versus mobile-bearing TKA was primarily based on age with patients younger than 70 years receiving a mobile-bearing TKA. We performed a lateral release whenever continuous symmetric patellar facet contact with the trochlear groove from 0 degrees to 90 degrees of flexion was not obtained using the rule of no thumb after tourniquet release. One hundred four of 1318 knees (7.9%) had a lateral release. We performed more lateral releases in the fixed-bearing group (14.3% [54 of 378]) than in the mobile-bearing group (5.3% [50 of 940]). Patellar tilt occurred more often in the mobile-bearing group (10% [94 of 940]) than in the fixed-bearing group (6.9% [26 of 378]), although the magnitude of mean patellar tilt was small in both groups (mobile-bearing 3.0 degrees ; fixed bearing 2.55 degrees ). No patient had patellar subluxation greater than 5 mm. We suspect the fewer lateral releases in the mobile-bearing group is the result of better extensor mechanism centralization provided by bearing rotation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18709430      PMCID: PMC2565058          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0425-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  31 in total

Review 1.  Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results.

Authors:  J J Callaghan; J N Insall; A S Greenwald; D A Dennis; R D Komistek; D W Murray; R B Bourne; C H Rorabeck; L D Dorr
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2001

2.  Patellofemoral functional results and complications with the posterior stabilized total condylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  P Aglietti; R Buzzi; A Gaudenzi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Lateral release rates after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R S Laskin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Prosthetic replacement of the patellofemoral joint.

Authors:  R D Scott
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence.

Authors:  A C Merchant; R L Mercer; R H Jacobsen; C R Cool
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement.

Authors:  Frederick F Buechel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  The patellofemoral component of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  G W Brick; R D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Optimizing patellofemoral tracking during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gwo-Chin Lee; Fred D Cushner; Giles R Scuderi; John N Insall
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Total condylar knee replacement. A study of factors influencing range of motion as late as two years after arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Schurman; J N Parker; D Ornstein
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Patellar dislocation following total knee replacement.

Authors:  R L Merkow; M Soudry; J N Insall
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  7 in total

1.  Mid-term results with a highly congruous mobile-bearing knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Roger G Lemaire
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Patellar tracking and anterior knee pain are similar after medial parapatellar and midvastus approaches in minimally invasive TKA.

Authors:  Boonchana Pongcharoen; Boonchna Pongcharoen; Thanasak Yakampor; Keerati Charoencholvanish
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Surgical technique: Lateral retinaculum release in knee arthroplasty using a stepwise, outside-in technique.

Authors:  Rajesh N Maniar; Tushar Singhi; Suyog Shashimohan Rathi; Jayesh Vinod Baviskar; Ravi Mohan Nayak
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Ten- to 14-Year Results of a High-Flex Rotating Platform Knee Implant: A Follow-Up Report of a Prospective Cohort.

Authors:  Adit R Maniar; Arpit Gajjar; Nishit Bhatnagar; Abhinav Mishra; Rajesh N Maniar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 1.033

5.  Less anterior knee pain with a routine lateral release in total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Guo-Chun Zha; Jun-Ying Sun; Sheng-Jie Dong
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The analysis of risk factors in no thumb test in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jee Hyoung Kim; Song Lee; Dong Oh Ko; Chang Wook Yoo; Tae Hwan Chun; Jung Soo Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-12-01

7.  Fracture of the insert cone of a polyethylene liner in a failed posterior-stabilized, rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Marc R Angerame; Jason M Jennings; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-11-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.