Literature DB >> 10685518

Embryo donation programs and policies in North America: survey results and implications for health and mental health professionals.

S A Kingsberg1, L D Applegarth, J W Janata.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use survey results from Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology to describe program policies regarding embryo donation, report protocols used for the disposition of cryopreserved embryos, and discuss clarification of guidelines governing ethical and psychosocially informed embryo donation. METHOD(S): A 66-item questionnaire was sent to the 312 Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology programs, generating 108 responses. RESULT(S): Seventy-eight (72%) of 108 programs offer embryo donation. Forty (37%) have actually performed donation, with 246 cycles completed and 53 "take-home babies." Disposition agreements for donors address divorce (92%) and death (90%). Only 28% require that potential donors undergo psychologic evaluation. Ninety-five percent of programs do not compensate donors. Seventy-one percent require a complete medical and psychologic history and 10% require genetic karyotyping. Three percent limit the number of donations. Eligible recipients include married couples (100%), unmarried couples (61%), lesbian couples (55%), and single women (59%). Sixty-four percent of programs require psychologic screening. Storage limits range from 2-10 years. Forty-nine percent of programs have unclaimed embryos in storage. CONCLUSION(S): Embryo donation is more often contemplated than performed. Variability in program procedures and policies suggests that guidelines need to be clarified. The complexity of the psychosocial and ethical issues underscores the importance of a routine, comprehensive psychologic assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10685518     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00506-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Disparities in parenting criteria: an exploration of the issues, focusing on adoption and embryo donation.

Authors:  H Widdows; F MacCallum
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  The validity of contracts to dispose of frozen embryos.

Authors:  G Pennings
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  What do patients want? Expectations and perceptions of IVF clinic information and support regarding frozen embryo disposition.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Matthew Lee; Jennifer Harrington; Gay Becker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  How couples who have undergone in vitro fertilization decide what to do with surplus frozen embryos.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Jennifer Harrington; Julia Duff; Matthew Lee; Gay Becker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  A hierarchy of needs? Embryo donation, in vitro fertilisation and the provision of infertility counselling.

Authors:  Laura Machin
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-10-28

6.  Embryo donation and understanding of kinship: the impact of law and policy.

Authors:  Jenni Millbank; Anita Stuhmcke; Isabel Karpin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 6.918

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.