Literature DB >> 26348956

Contesting estimates of cryopreserved embryos in the United States.

Dave Snow1, Alana Cattapan2, Françoise Baylis2,3.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26348956     DOI： 10.1038/nbt.3342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Biotechnol        ISSN： 1087-0156            Impact factor:   54.908


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Cryopreserved embryos in the United States and their availability for research.

Authors:  David I Hoffman; Gail L Zellman; C Christine Fair; Jacob F Mayer; Joyce G Zeitz; William E Gibbons; Thomas G Turner
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Correcting misperceptions about cryopreserved embryos and stem cell research.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Lomax; Alan O Trounson
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  How couples who have undergone in vitro fertilization decide what to do with surplus frozen embryos.

Authors:  Robert D Nachtigall; Kirstin Mac Dougall; Jennifer Harrington; Julia Duff; Matthew Lee; Gay Becker
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Impact of day 3 or day 5 embryo transfer on pregnancy rates and multiple gestations.

Authors:  Ronald Beesley; Randal Robinson; Anthony Propst; Nancy Arthur; Matthew Retzloff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 7.329
  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Reply to Contesting estimates of cryopreserved embryos in the United States.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Cryostorage failures: a medicolegal review.

Authors:  Christopher P Moutos; Rana Lahham; John Y Phelps
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Human embryos and eggs: from long-term storage to biobanking.

Authors:  Françoise Baylis; Heather Widdows
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.