BACKGROUND: Accurate, reproducible, and noninvasive assessment of hip cartilage is clinically relevant and provides a means by which to assess the suitability of candidates for arthroscopic or open surgical procedures and the response to such interventions over time. Given the relatively thin cartilage of the hip and the complex spherical anatomy, however, accurately assessing the cartilage poses a challenge for traditional MRI techniques. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We assessed the current status of imaging articular cartilage of the hip through a comprehensive review of recent literature. METHODS: We performed a literature review using PubMed. Topics included quantitative MRI, imaging of the hip cartilage and labrum, femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, and osteoarthritis of the hip. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: With the use of high in-plane and through-plane resolution, reproducible assessment of hip cartilage and labrum is clinically feasible. More recent quantitative MR techniques also allow for noninvasive assessment of collagen orientation and proteoglycan content in articular cartilage, thus providing insight into early matrix degeneration. These techniques can be applied to cohorts at risk for osteoarthritis, helping to predict cartilage degeneration before symptoms progress and osteoarthritic changes are visible on radiographs. WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: Prospective longitudinal data registries are necessary for developing predictive models of osteoarthritis and subsequent joint failure to assess the results of surgical intervention and predict the timing of arthroplasty. HOW DO WE GET THERE?: By establishing more hip cartilage registries, a correlation can be made between subjective measures and morphologic MRI to assess the cartilage, labrum, bone, and synovial lining of the hip.
BACKGROUND: Accurate, reproducible, and noninvasive assessment of hip cartilage is clinically relevant and provides a means by which to assess the suitability of candidates for arthroscopic or open surgical procedures and the response to such interventions over time. Given the relatively thin cartilage of the hip and the complex spherical anatomy, however, accurately assessing the cartilage poses a challenge for traditional MRI techniques. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We assessed the current status of imaging articular cartilage of the hip through a comprehensive review of recent literature. METHODS: We performed a literature review using PubMed. Topics included quantitative MRI, imaging of the hip cartilage and labrum, femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, and osteoarthritis of the hip. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: With the use of high in-plane and through-plane resolution, reproducible assessment of hip cartilage and labrum is clinically feasible. More recent quantitative MR techniques also allow for noninvasive assessment of collagen orientation and proteoglycan content in articular cartilage, thus providing insight into early matrix degeneration. These techniques can be applied to cohorts at risk for osteoarthritis, helping to predict cartilage degeneration before symptoms progress and osteoarthritic changes are visible on radiographs. WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: Prospective longitudinal data registries are necessary for developing predictive models of osteoarthritis and subsequent joint failure to assess the results of surgical intervention and predict the timing of arthroplasty. HOW DO WE GET THERE?: By establishing more hip cartilage registries, a correlation can be made between subjective measures and morphologic MRI to assess the cartilage, labrum, bone, and synovial lining of the hip.
Authors: Asheesh Bedi; Mark Dolan; Iftach Hetsroni; Erin Magennis; Joseph Lipman; Robert Buly; Bryan T Kelly Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Donna G Blankenbaker; Steven R Ullrick; Richard Kijowski; Kirkland W Davis; Arthur A De Smet; Kazuhiko Shinki; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; James S Keene Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Laith M Jazrawi; Michael J Alaia; Gregory Chang; Erin F Fitzgerald; Michael P Recht Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2011-07 Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Young-Jo Kim; Diego Jaramillo; Michael B Millis; Martha L Gray; Deborah Burstein Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Tzu-Chieh Liao; Michael A Samaan; Tijana Popovic; Jan Neumann; Alan L Zhang; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar; Richard B Souza Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: Christine L Abraham; Neal K Bangerter; Lance S McGavin; Christopher L Peters; Alex J Drew; Christopher J Hanrahan; Andrew E Anderson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Klaus A Siebenrock; Karl-Philipp Kienle; Simon D Steppacher; Moritz Tannast; Tallal C Mamisch; Brigitte von Rechenberg Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Andrea Lazik-Palm; Oliver Kraff; Christina Geis; Sören Johst; Juliane Goebel; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick; Jens M Theysohn Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 5.315