Literature DB >> 18752277

Modes of periacetabular load transfer to cortical and cancellous bone after cemented versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study using computed tomography-assisted osteodensitometry.

Lutz Arne Mueller1, Rainer Schmidt, Cornelia Ehrmann, Tobias Eckhard Nowak, Alexander Kress, Raimund Forst, David Pfander.   

Abstract

Stress-shielding and periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty (THA) may be clinically relevant for high-demand patients. Analysis of cortical and cancellous bone density (BD) changes in vivo after THA is of interest to basic science researchers and joint reconstruction surgeons. An insufficient periprosthetic bone stock may predispose to migration, early mechanical failure, and major problems in revision surgery. We used computed tomography (CT)-assisted osteodensitometry in two prospectively analyzed cohorts after cemented (n = 21) versus noncemented (n = 23) cup fixation. Periacetabular BD (mgCaHa/mL) was determined in five CT scans cranial and five CT scans at the level of the cup 10 days and 26 months postoperatively. For press-fit cups BD decreased significantly in all CT cans except in four out of the five scans of cortical bone cranial to the cup. The decrease was highest for cancellous bone ventral to the cup (-45 to -53%). After cemented cup fixation, significant cortical BD decrease was seen ventral to the cup (-11 to -20%). Cancellous BD decrased only ventral (-21 to -31%) and in two scans cranial (-11 and -12%) to the cup. The modes of load transfer between cemented and uncemented cups differ fundamentally. Cemented cups especially prevent the loss of cancellous bone of the acetabulum while also cortical BD loss was significantly lower in most CT scans surrounding the cemented cup compared to the press-fit component. Long-term results are required to prove whether third-generation cementing technique protects periprosthetic BD and thereby improve implant survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18752277     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Comparison of different cup revision systems].

Authors:  K Trieb
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Direct comparison of polyethylene wear in cemented and uncemented acetabular cups.

Authors:  Håvard Bjerkholt; Oystein Høvik; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-09-02

3.  Intra- and inter-observer agreement and reliability of bone mineral density measurements around acetabular cup: a porcine ex-vivo study using single- and dual-energy computed tomography.

Authors:  Bo Mussmann; Søren Overgaard; Trine Torfing; Morten Bøgehøj; Oke Gerke; Poul Erik Andersen
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2017-07-14

4.  To cement or not to cement acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and re-evaluation.

Authors:  Frank Van Praet; Michiel Mulier
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2019-10-01

5.  Uncemented versus cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Wenlu Liu; Huanyi Lin; Xianshang Zeng; Meiji Chen; Weiwei Tang; Ting Zhou; Weiguang Yu; Qilong Liu; Guixing Xu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 1.671

6.  Cancellous and cortical bone mineral density around an elastic press-fit socket in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dean F M Pakvis; Petra J C Heesterbeek; Marianne Severens; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.717

7.  Bone density measurements adjacent to acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty using dual-energy CT: an in vivo reliability and agreement study.

Authors:  Bo Mussmann; Poul Erik Andersen; Trine Torfing; Søren Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2018-08-30
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.