Literature DB >> 11417234

[Hooked roof cup in revision of difficult loose hip prosthesis cups. Results after a minimum of 10 years].

K A Siebenrock1, M Trochsler, H Sadri, R Ganz.   

Abstract

The long-term results of acetabular revision after total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of a reinforcement ring with hook were evaluated. The study included 57 cases of surgery dating back 10 years or more. Of a total of 54 patients (57 operated hips), 18 patients (19 hips) died during the 10-year period and 2 patients (2 hips) were completely lost to follow-up. At the time of the revision surgery, the mean age of the remaining 34 patients (36 hips) was 62.5 years (range: 47-80). A THA revision was done in 25 cases and an acetabular revision only in 11 cases. The most common acetabular defect was a combined segmental and cavitary defect (n = 19), and in three cases there was pelvic discontinuity. Autologous or homologous cancellous bone grafts were used to fill acetabular cavities in 17 hip joints. Structured bone grafts, predominantly homologous bone, were used in ten cases for acetabular reconstruction. At a mean follow-up of 11.4 years (range: 10-14.5) three hip joints (8%) had undergone further revision. The revisions were done for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in two cases and a septic loosening of both components in one case. Three further cases (8%) revealed signs of acetabular loosening. Two of these three patients were symptomatic but refused further revision surgery. In the 33 unrevised hip joints, a good or excellent clinical result with a d'Aubingé score of more than 14 points was found in 30 cases (92%). Osseous acetabular reconstruction with the use of a reinforcement ring leads to favorable results compared to other techniques. In the authors' opinion, this technique is preferable to those using oversized cups without osseous reconstruction of the acetabulum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11417234     DOI: 10.1007/s001320050608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Comparison of different cup revision systems].

Authors:  K Trieb
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luc Kerboull; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.

Authors:  Jan Schmolders; Max J Friedrich; Robert D Michel; Thomas M Randau; Matthias D Wimmer; Andreas C Strauss; Hendrik Kohlhof; Dieter C Wirtz; Sascha Gravius
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Results of the cementless Plasmacup in revision total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 72 cases with an average follow-up of eight years.

Authors:  Stefan Lakemeier; Guenter Aurand; Nina Timmesfeld; Thomas J Heyse; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Markus D Schofer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Minimum ten year results of total hip arthroplasty with the acetabular reinforcement ring in avascular osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Peter P Koch; Moritz Tannast; Hiroshi Fujita; Klaus Siebenrock; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  [Acetabular reinforcement rings in revision total hip arthroplasty: midterm results in 298 cases].

Authors:  U J Schlegel; R G Bitsch; M Pritsch; P R Aldinger; H Mau; S J Breusch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  The Ganz acetabular reinforcement ring shows excellent long-term results when used as a primary implant: a retrospective analysis of two hundred and forty primary total hip arthroplasties with a minimum follow-up of twenty years.

Authors:  Marc C Attinger; Pascal C Haefeli; Henrik C Bäcker; Remy Flueckiger; Peter M Ballmer; Klaus A Siebenrock; Frank M Klenke
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-01-20       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  10-Year Survival of Acetabular Reinforcement Rings/Cages for Complex Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander Ewers; Christian Spross; Lukas Ebneter; Fabrice Külling; Karlmeinrad Giesinger; Vilijam Zdravkovic; Johannes Erhardt
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-05-15

9.  Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.

Authors:  Masaaki Maruyama; Shinji Wakabayashi; Hiroshi Ota; Keiji Tensho
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.