Literature DB >> 22137567

The role of auditory feedback in vocal learning and maintenance.

Katherine Tschida1, Richard Mooney.   

Abstract

Auditory experience is critical for the acquisition and maintenance of learned vocalizations in both humans and songbirds. Despite the central role of auditory feedback in vocal learning and maintenance, where and how auditory feedback affects neural circuits important to vocal control remain poorly understood. Recent studies of singing birds have uncovered neural mechanisms by which feedback perturbations affect vocal plasticity and also have identified feedback-sensitive neurons at or near sites of auditory and vocal motor interaction. Additionally, recent studies in marmosets have underscored that even in the absence of vocal learning, vocalization remains flexible in the face of changing acoustical environments, pointing to rapid interactions between auditory and vocal motor systems. Finally, recent studies show that a juvenile songbird's initial auditory experience of a song model has long-lasting effects on sensorimotor neurons important to vocalization, shedding light on how auditory memories and feedback interact to guide vocal learning.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22137567      PMCID: PMC3297733          DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol        ISSN: 0959-4388            Impact factor:   6.627


  53 in total

1.  Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback.

Authors:  A Leonardo; M Konishi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning.

Authors:  C Scharff; F Nottebohm
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Social context rapidly modulates the influence of auditory feedback on avian vocal motor control.

Authors:  Jon T Sakata; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A basal ganglia-forebrain circuit in the songbird biases motor output to avoid vocal errors.

Authors:  Aaron S Andalman; Michale S Fee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.

Authors:  J L ELman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Indication of a Lombard vocal response in the St. Lawrence River Beluga.

Authors:  P M Scheifele; S Andrew; R A Cooper; M Darre; F E Musiek; L Max
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A neural basis for auditory feedback control of vocal pitch.

Authors:  Michael Smotherman; Shuyi Zhang; Walter Metzner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Sensory-motor interaction in the primate auditory cortex during self-initiated vocalizations.

Authors:  Steven J Eliades; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  A synaptic basis for auditory-vocal integration in the songbird.

Authors:  Eric E Bauer; Melissa J Coleman; Todd F Roberts; Arani Roy; Jonathan F Prather; Richard Mooney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Behavioral dopamine signals.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: I. Development and Description of the Pause Marker.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Edythe A Strand; Marios Fourakis; Kathy J Jakielski; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Mabie; Jane L McSweeny; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Vocal motor changes beyond the sensitive period for song plasticity.

Authors:  Logan S James; Jon T Sakata
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The neurobiology of innate, volitional and learned vocalizations in mammals and birds.

Authors:  Andreas Nieder; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Seasonal changes of perineuronal nets and song learning in adult canaries (Serinus canaria).

Authors:  Gilles Cornez; Clémentine Collignon; Wendt Müller; Gregory F Ball; Charlotte A Cornil; Jacques Balthazart
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Set and setting: how behavioral state regulates sensory function and plasticity.

Authors:  Sara J Aton
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 6.  Insights into the Neural and Genetic Basis of Vocal Communication.

Authors:  Genevieve Konopka; Todd F Roberts
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  A Diagnostic Marker to Discriminate Childhood Apraxia of Speech From Speech Delay: III. Theoretical Coherence of the Pause Marker with Speech Processing Deficits in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Lawrence D Shriberg; Edythe A Strand; Marios Fourakis; Kathy J Jakielski; Sheryl D Hall; Heather B Karlsson; Heather L Mabie; Jane L McSweeny; Christie M Tilkens; David L Wilson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 8.  At the interface of the auditory and vocal motor systems: NIf and its role in vocal processing, production and learning.

Authors:  Brian Lewandowski; Alexei Vyssotski; Richard H R Hahnloser; Marc Schmidt
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2013-04-17

9.  Vocal learning beyond imitation: mechanisms of adaptive vocal development in songbirds and human infants.

Authors:  Ofer Tchernichovski; Gary Marcus
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  Young and intense: FoxP2 immunoreactivity in Area X varies with age, song stereotypy, and singing in male zebra finches.

Authors:  Christopher K Thompson; Fabian Schwabe; Alexander Schoof; Ezequiel Mendoza; Jutta Gampe; Christelle Rochefort; Constance Scharff
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.