Literature DB >> 19672679

The mean machine; accurate non-invasive blood pressure measurement in the critically ill patient.

Sandy Muecke1, Andrew Bersten, John Plummer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Accurate indirect prehospital blood pressure measurement in the critically ill patient remains an important challenge to both patient management and prehospital research. Ambulatory blood pressure measuring devices have not been trialled for prehospital use in critically ill patients. Prior to prehospital validation where conditions are suboptimal, we aimed to test under favourable conditions in the Intensive Care Unit, a selection of ambulatory devices that may be suitable for use in the field.
METHODS: Systolic, diastolic and mean pressures of three ambulatory devices were compared to the average of 1 min of independently recorded, high fidelity intra-arterial reference pressures. Eighteen critically ill patients were recruited. Device performance was required to fulfil the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) protocol. Additionally, agreement between measurement methods was examined using Bland-Altman plots. Two-level linear mixed model analyses were under- taken.
RESULTS: For each device, 150 paired measurements (arterial reference and device) were analysed. According to the AAMI protocol, no device measured systolic pressures accurately. One device measured diastolic pressures accurately. Integrated mean pressures were accurately measured by all devices. Overall, SunTech Medical's Oscar 2 performed best with mean pressure error not exceeding 17 mmHg. For this device, Bland-Altman plots showed uniform agreement across a wide range of mean pressures. Two-level linear mixed effects analyses showed that Oscar 2 mean error reduced during vasopressor use by (-) 3.9 mmHg (95% CI -5.9, -1.9; P < 0.001), and clinically, performance was little affected during mechanical ventilation. For the Oscar 2, there was up to (-) 7.0 mmHg (95% CI -10.3, -3.5; P < 0.001) l ess mean error during hypotension compared to normo- tension.
CONCLUSIONS: In the Intensive Care Unit, the performance of one device, the Oscar 2, surpassed the others and fulfilled the AAMI protocol criteria for mean pressure measurement. This device is suitable for prehospital validation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19672679     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-009-9195-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  54 in total

1.  Implementation of research in the out-of-hospital setting.

Authors:  E Brooke Lerner; Vincent Mosesso; Christopher Zak
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2002 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 2.  ABC of hypertension. Blood pressure measurement. Part I-sphygmomanometry: factors common to all techniques.

Authors:  G Beevers; G Y Lip; E O'Brien
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-04-21

3.  STUDIES IN CLINICAL SHOCK AND HYPOTENSION; THE VALUE OF BEDSIDE HEMODYNAMIC OBSERVATIONS.

Authors:  J N COHN; M H LURIA
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1964-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Comparison of indirect and direct methods of measuring arterial blood pressure.

Authors:  F H VAN BERGEN; D S WEATHERHEAD; A E TRELOAR; A B DOBKIN; J J BUCKLEY
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1954-10       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Blood pressure monitoring: automated oscillometric devices.

Authors:  M Ramsey
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-01

Review 6.  Hemodynamic monitoring: invasive techniques.

Authors:  N Buchbinder; W Ganz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Factors influencing the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurement in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Andreas Bur; Harald Herkner; Marianne Vlcek; Christian Woisetschläger; Ulla Derhaschnig; Georg Delle Karth; Anton N Laggner; Michael M Hirschl
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Analysis and correction of pressure wave distortion in fluid-filled catheter systems.

Authors:  H L Falsetti; R E Mates; R J Carroll; R L Gupta; A C Bell
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Repeated reflection of waves in the systemic arterial system.

Authors:  D S Berger; J K Li; W K Laskey; A Noordergraaf
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1993-01

10.  Oscillometry and direct blood pressure: a comparative clinical study during deliberate hypotension.

Authors:  M Gourdeau; R Martin; Y Lamarche; L Tétreault
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-05
View more
  4 in total

1.  The mean prehospital machine; accurate prehospital non-invasive blood pressure measurement in the critically ill patient.

Authors:  Sandy Muecke; Andrew Bersten; John Plummer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Validation of arterial blood pressures observed from the patient monitor; a tool for prehospital research.

Authors:  Sandy Muecke; Andrew Bersten; John Plummer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Noninvasive techniques for blood pressure measurement are not a reliable alternative to direct measurement: a randomized crossover trial in ICU.

Authors:  Sara Ribezzo; Eleonora Spina; Stefano Di Bartolomeo; Gianfranco Sanson
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-30

Review 4.  Sources of inaccuracy in the measurement of adult patients' resting blood pressure in clinical settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Noa Kallioinen; Andrew Hill; Mark S Horswill; Helen E Ward; Marcus O Watson
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.844

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.