Literature DB >> 22538700

The degree of gallbladder wall thickness and its impact on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Shankar R Raman1, Dovid Moradi, Bassem M Samaan, Umar S Chaudhry, Kamal Nagpal, John Morgan Cosgrove, Daniel T Farkas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold-standard procedure for management of symptomatic gallstone disease. Increased rates of conversion to an open procedure, increased postoperative complications, and longer lengths of stay are seen in thick-walled gallbladders. Previous studies have only evaluated gallbladder walls as being thick or not thick, without looking at the degree of thickness. We hypothesized that, the more severe the wall thickening, the greater the chance of conversions and complications, and the longer the lengths of stay.
METHODS: All attempted laparoscopic cholecystectomies in our institution between 2006 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing cholecystectomy for reasons other than gallstones (e.g., polyps or cancer) and those without preoperative ultrasounds were excluded. Patients were divided into four groups based on the degree of gallbladder wall thickness: normal (1-2 mm), mildly thickened (3-4 mm), moderately thickened (5-6 mm), and severely thickened (7 mm and above). Outcomes were compared amongst the groups.
RESULTS: 874 patients were included in the study. There were 68 conversions (7.8 %) and 58 complications (6.6 %). The incidence of conversions was 3.1, 5.1, 14.9, and 16.8 % in the four groups, respectively (p < 0.001, χ (2)), and the incidence of complications was 1.8, 6.7, 9.1, and 13.1 %, respectively (p = 0.001, χ (2)). The mean (± standard deviation, SD) length of stay in days was 1.09 ± 1.42, 1.83 ± 3.24, 2.54 ± 3.40 and 3.54 ± 4.61, respectively [p < 0.001, analysis of variance (ANOVA)].
CONCLUSIONS: A greater degree of gallbladder wall thickness is associated with an increased risk of conversion, increased postoperative complications, and longer lengths of stay. Classifying patients according to degree of gallbladder wall thickness gives more accurate assessment of the risk of surgery, as well as potential outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22538700     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2310-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  30 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  C F Chandler; J S Lane; P Ferguson; J E Thompson; S W Ashley
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  S B Kolla; S Aggarwal; A Kumar; R Kumar; S Chumber; R Parshad; V Seenu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A prospective randomized trial of day-stay only versus overnight-stay laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P Hollington; G J Toogood; R T Padbury
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1999-12

4.  Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  E Trondsen; O Reiertsen; O K Andersen; P Kjaersgaard
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1993-04

5.  Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Timothy D Jackson; Jeffrey J Wannares; R Todd Lancaster; David W Rattner; Matthew M Hutter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Shea; M J Healey; J A Berlin; J R Clarke; P F Malet; R N Staroscik; J S Schwartz; S V Williams
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database.

Authors:  Urs F Giger; Jean-Marie Michel; Isabelle Opitz; Devdas Th Inderbitzin; Thomas Kocher; Lukas Krähenbühl
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-20       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Predicting major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a simple risk score.

Authors:  Melissa M Murphy; Shimul A Shah; Jessica P Simons; Nicholas G Csikesz; Theodore P McDade; Andreea Bodnari; Sing-Chau Ng; Zheng Zhou; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J H Peters; G D Gibbons; J T Innes; K E Nichols; M E Front; S R Roby; E C Ellison
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  A difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy that requires conversion to open procedure can be predicted by preoperative ultrasonography.

Authors:  Pawan Lal; P N Agarwal; Vinod Kumar Malik; A L Chakravarti
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  8 in total

1.  Histopathological gallbladder morphometric measurements in geriatric patients with symptomatic chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  F Yaylak; A Deger; Z Bayhan; C Kocak; S Zeren; F E Kocak; M F Ekici; M C Algın
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  [Robot-assisted surgery - Progress or expensive toy? : Matched-pair comparative analysis of robot-assisted cholecystectomy vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy].

Authors:  R Albrecht; D Haase; R Zippel; H Koch; U Settmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Does ultrasonography accurately diagnose acute cholecystitis? Improving diagnostic accuracy based on a review at a regional hospital.

Authors:  Hamish Hwang; Ian Marsh; Jason Doyle
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Zain A Sobani; Christina Ling; Tarun Rustagi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  The effect of insurance status on outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Samantha J Neureuther; Kamal Nagpal; Arieh Greenbaum; John M Cosgrove; Daniel T Farkas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Preoperative and Operative Risk Factors for Conversion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Cholecystectomy in Pakistan.

Authors:  Amina Amin; Muhammad Ijlal Haider; Iram S Aamir; Muhammad Sohaib Khan; Usama Khalid Choudry; Mohammad Amir; Abdullah Sadiq
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-08-20

Review 7.  Patient selection for ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Weiwei Chen; Qiang Wu; Ning Fu; Zhiming Yang; Jingcheng Hao
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Risk factors for patient selection in ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A Single-centre experience.

Authors:  Qiang Wu; Ning Fu; Weiwei Chen; Xueli Jin; Lei He; Chencheng Mo; Jiao Chen; Daoyun Luo; Minkun Ma; Hongqiang Yang; Jingcheng Hao
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.407

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.