Literature DB >> 18656637

Trends in surgical management for acute cholecystitis.

Nicholas G Csikesz1, Jennifer F Tseng, Shimul A Shah.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Cholecystectomy, which can be performed with either a laparoscopic (LC) or open (OC) approach, remains the definitive treatment for acute cholecystitis (AC) in the United States. There has not been an overall evaluation of the safety and efficacy of LC vs. OC as treatment for AC.
METHODS: We used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify all patients with AC from 1998-2005. Rates of LC or OC, patient and hospital characteristics, hospital cost, and mortality were analyzed. In order to assess if differences in outcomes exist, propensity scores were created to eliminate differences in cohorts. A case-controlled analysis was then performed, comparing in-hospital mortality and likelihood of conversion to OC.
RESULTS: From approximately 1.8 million admissions for AC, 1.4 million patients underwent cholecystectomy (1,240,212 LC; 147,190 OC) for AC from 1998 to 2005. The number of cholecystectomies increased over time. The ratio of LC performed increased from 83% in 1998 to 93% in 2005; 12% of cases were attempted laparoscopically but converted to OC. When compared with OC, patients who underwent LC were more likely to be female, carry private insurance, be discharged to home, have lesser hospital cost per patient, have no comorbid conditions, and have a lesser unadjusted mortality. After adjusting for age, comorbidity and sex, the adjusted odds ratio for death was 4.6-fold greater (95% CI 4.1-5.1) with OC compared with LC as the treatment for AC.
CONCLUSIONS: LC is performed with increasing frequency as the treatment for AC with lesser mortality, hospital stay, and cost compared with OC. Despite differences in cohorts, these results support a continued aggressive approach with laparoscopy as the treatment of choice for AC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18656637     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  26 in total

1.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Hospitalization for complications of cirrhosis: does volume matter?

Authors:  Anand Singla; James L Hart; Youfu Li; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Findings at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography after endoscopic treatment of postcholecystectomy bile leaks.

Authors:  Gregory A Coté; Michael Ansstas; Somal Shah; Rajesh N Keswani; Saad Alkade; Sreenivasa S Jonnalagadda; Steven A Edmundowicz; Riad R Azar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Csikesz; Anand Singla; Melissa M Murphy; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Jessica Widmer; Paloma Alvarez; Reem Z Sharaiha; Sonia Gossain; Prashant Kedia; Savreet Sarkaria; Amrita Sethi; Brian G Turner; Jennifer Millman; Michael Lieberman; Govind Nandakumar; Hiren Umrania; Monica Gaidhane; Michel Kahaleh
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2015-09-30

6.  Use and benefits of laparoscopic hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer among medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Alfred I Neugut; Elizabeth T Wilde; Donna L Buono; Wei-Yann Tsai; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Comparative effectiveness of robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; William M Burke; Elizabeth T Wilde; Sharyn N Lewin; Abigail S Charles; Jin Hee Kim; Noah Goldman; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Current status of laparoscopy for acute abdomen in Italy: a critical appraisal of 2012 clinical guidelines from two consecutive nationwide surveys with analysis of 271,323 cases over 5 years.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Mauro Podda; Nicola Cillara; Graziano Pernazza; Valentina Giaccaglia; Luigi Ciccoritti; Giovanna Ioia; Stefano Mandalà; Camillo La Barbera; Arianna Birindelli; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Better treatment strategies for patients with acute cholecystitis and American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 3 or greater.

Authors:  Sung Su Yun; Dae Wook Hwang; Se Won Kim; Sang Hwan Park; Sang Jin Park; Dong Shick Lee; Hong Jin Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  The impact of socioeconomic status on presentation and treatment of diverticular disease.

Authors:  Nicholas G Csikesz; Anand Singla; Jessica P Simons; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.