Literature DB >> 19668599

Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis.

Douglas Roland1, Frederic Dick, Jeffrey L Elman.   

Abstract

Many recent models of language comprehension have stressed the role of distributional frequencies in determining the relative accessibility or ease of processing associated with a particular lexical item or sentence structure. However, there exist relatively few comprehensive analyses of structural frequencies, and little consideration has been given to the appropriateness of using any particular set of corpus frequencies in modeling human language. We provide a comprehensive set of structural frequencies for a variety of written and spoken corpora, focusing on structures that have played a critical role in debates on normal psycholinguistics, aphasia, and child language acquisition, and compare our results with those from several recent papers to illustrate the implications and limitations of using corpus data in psycholinguistic research.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19668599      PMCID: PMC2722756          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  39 in total

Review 1.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Proactive interference effects on sentence production.

Authors:  Victor S Ferreira; Carla E Firato
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: the role of working memory.

Authors:  Sandra H Vos; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-03

4.  The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity.

Authors:  Tessa Warren; Edward Gibson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-08

5.  Memory-load interference in syntactic processing.

Authors:  Peter C Gordon; Randall Hendrick; William H Levine
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-09

6.  Understanding and producing the reduced relative construction: Evidence from ratings, editing and corpora.

Authors:  Mary Hare; Michael K Tanenhaus; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Verb subcategorization frequencies: American English corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons.

Authors:  Susanne Gahl; Dan Jurafsky; Douglas Roland
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2004-08

8.  The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences.

Authors:  Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

10.  The relationship between the frequency and the processing complexity of linguistic structure.

Authors:  E Gibson; C T Schütze; A Salomon
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1996-01
View more
  53 in total

1.  Understanding and producing the reduced relative construction: Evidence from ratings, editing and corpora.

Authors:  Mary Hare; Michael K Tanenhaus; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Animacy and competition in relative clause production: a cross-linguistic investigation.

Authors:  Silvia P Gennari; Jelena Mirković; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Semantic indeterminacy in object relative clauses.

Authors:  Silvia P Gennari; Maryellen C Macdonald
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Bilingual deaf readers' use of semantic and syntactic cues in the processing of English relative clauses.

Authors:  Pilar Piñar; Matthew T Carlson; Jill P Morford; Paola E Dussias
Journal:  Biling (Camb Engl)       Date:  2016-06-29

5.  Sentence Repetition Accuracy in Adults With Developmental Language Impairment: Interactions of Participant Capacities and Sentence Structures.

Authors:  Gerard H Poll; Carol A Miller; Janet G van Hell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Text exposure predicts spoken production of complex sentences in 8- and 12-year-old children and adults.

Authors:  Jessica L Montag; Maryellen C MacDonald
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2015-04

7.  Online Sentence Reading in People With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Jessica Knilans; Gayle DeDe
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.408

8.  A novel eye-tracking method to assess attention allocation in individuals with and without aphasia using a dual-task paradigm.

Authors:  Sabine Heuer; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.288

9.  The use of context in resolving syntactic ambiguity: Structural and semantic influences.

Authors:  Kathryn Bousquet; Tamara Y Swaab; Debra L Long
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Gender differences in speech temporal patterns detected using lagged co-occurrence text-analysis of personal narratives.

Authors:  Shuki J Cohen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2008-11-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.