Literature DB >> 22162904

Understanding and producing the reduced relative construction: Evidence from ratings, editing and corpora.

Mary Hare1, Michael K Tanenhaus, Ken McRae.   

Abstract

Tworating studies demonstrate that English speakers willingly produce reduced relatives with internal cause verbs (e.g., Whisky fermented in oak barrels can have a woody taste), and judge their acceptability based on factors known to influence ambiguity resolution, rather than on the internal/external cause distinction. Regression analyses demonstrate that frequency of passive usage predicts reduced relative frequency in corpora, but internal/external cause status does not. The authors conclude that reduced relatives with internal cause verbs are rare because few of these verbs occur in the passive. This contrasts with the claim in McKoon and Ratcliff (McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (2003). Meaning through syntax: Language comprehension and the reduced relative clause construction. Psychological Review, 110, 490-525) that reduced relatives like The horse raced past the barn fell are rare and, when they occur, incomprehensible, because the meaning of the reduced relative construction prohibits the use of a verb with an internal cause event template.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 22162904      PMCID: PMC3234689          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  15 in total

1.  Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language.

Authors:  Adele E. Goldberg
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  Meaning through syntax: language comprehension and the reduced relative clause construction.

Authors:  Gail McKoon; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Event templates in the lexical representations of verbs.

Authors:  Gail McKoon; Talke Macfarland
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2003-09

5.  Discourse influences during parsing are delayed.

Authors:  K Rayner; S Garrod; C A Perfetti
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1992-11

6.  On the semantic content of subcategorization frames.

Authors:  C Fisher; H Gleitman; L R Gleitman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Human simulations of vocabulary learning.

Authors:  J Gillette; H Gleitman; L Gleitman; A Lederer
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-07

8.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; A D Well
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Context effects in syntactic ambiguity resolution: discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses.

Authors:  M J Spivey-Knowlton; J C Trueswell; M K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1993-06

10.  Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis.

Authors:  Douglas Roland; Frederic Dick; Jeffrey L Elman
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more
  7 in total

1.  Gradiency and Visual Context in Syntactic Garden-Paths.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Sarah A Cargill; Michael J Spivey
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution: readers vary in their use of plausibility information.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Chantel S Prat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

Review 3.  Using experiential optimization to build lexical representations.

Authors:  Brendan T Johns; Michael N Jones; D J K Mewhort
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

4.  Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis.

Authors:  Douglas Roland; Frederic Dick; Jeffrey L Elman
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.331

7.  Rapid Expectation Adaptation during Syntactic Comprehension.

Authors:  Alex B Fine; T Florian Jaeger; Thomas A Farmer; Ting Qian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.