Literature DB >> 25913549

A novel eye-tracking method to assess attention allocation in individuals with and without aphasia using a dual-task paradigm.

Sabine Heuer1, Brooke Hallowell2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Numerous authors report that people with aphasia have greater difficulty allocating attention than people without neurological disorders. Studying how attention deficits contribute to language deficits is important. However, existing methods for indexing attention allocation in people with aphasia pose serious methodological challenges. Eye-tracking methods have great potential to address such challenges. We developed and assessed the validity of a new dual-task method incorporating eye tracking to assess attention allocation. Twenty-six adults with aphasia and 33 control participants completed auditory sentence comprehension and visual search tasks. To test whether the new method validly indexes well-documented patterns in attention allocation, demands were manipulated by varying task complexity in single- and dual-task conditions. Differences in attention allocation were indexed via eye-tracking measures. For all participants significant increases in attention allocation demands were observed from single- to dual-task conditions and from simple to complex stimuli. Individuals with aphasia had greater difficulty allocating attention with greater task demands. Relationships between eye-tracking indices of comprehension during single and dual tasks and standardized testing were examined. Results support the validity of the novel eye-tracking method for assessing attention allocation in people with and without aphasia. Clinical and research implications are discussed. LEARNING OUTCOMES: Readers will be able to: (1) summarize the nature of dual-task paradigms, (2) identify shortcomings of existing dual-task measures of attention allocation for application to people with aphasia, (3) describe how eye-tracking measures may be recorded and analyzed to reflect differences in attention allocation across conditions, and (4) summarize potential clinical applications for eye-tracking measures of attention allocation.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aphasia; Attention allocation; Cognition; Dual task; Eye movement; Eye tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25913549      PMCID: PMC4437869          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2015.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Disord        ISSN: 0021-9924            Impact factor:   2.288


  35 in total

Review 1.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.

Authors:  D Caplan; G S Waters
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Eye movements and lexical access in spoken-language comprehension: evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing.

Authors:  M K Tanenhaus; J S Magnuson; D Dahan; C Chambers
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-11

3.  What Goes Wrong during Passive Sentence Production in Agrammatic Aphasia: An Eyetracking Study.

Authors:  Soojin Cho; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.773

4.  Real-time production of unergative and unaccusative sentences in normal and agrammatic speakers: An eyetracking study.

Authors:  Jiyeon Lee; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.773

5.  Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia.

Authors:  William D Hula; Malcolm R McNeil
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.761

6.  Auditory processing in individuals with mild aphasia: a study of resource allocation.

Authors:  L L Murray; A L Holland; P M Beeson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  R N Shepard; J Metzler
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-02-19       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The intensity dimension of thought: pupillometric indices of sentence processing.

Authors:  M A Just; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  1993-06

9.  The logic of neuropsychological research and the problem of patient classification in aphasia.

Authors:  A Caramazza
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Frequency of Basic English Grammatical Structures: A Corpus Analysis.

Authors:  Douglas Roland; Frederic Dick; Jeffrey L Elman
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more
  5 in total

1.  More Than the Verbal Stimulus Matters: Visual Attention in Language Assessment for People With Aphasia Using Multiple-Choice Image Displays.

Authors:  Sabine Heuer; Maria V Ivanova; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Assessment of alerting, orienting, and executive control in persons with aphasia using the Attention Network Test.

Authors:  Arianna N LaCroix; McKayla Tully; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.773

3.  Detailed Vision Screening Results from a Cohort of Individuals with Aphasia.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Ankita M Bhutada
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.773

4.  Hypoconnectivity of Resting-State Networks in Persons with Aphasia Compared with Healthy Age-Matched Adults.

Authors:  Chaleece W Sandberg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Comprehension of Co-Speech Gestures in Aphasic Patients: An Eye Movement Study.

Authors:  Noëmi Eggenberger; Basil C Preisig; Rahel Schumacher; Simone Hopfner; Tim Vanbellingen; Thomas Nyffeler; Klemens Gutbrod; Jean-Marie Annoni; Stephan Bohlhalter; Dario Cazzoli; René M Müri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.