Literature DB >> 32953924

The use of context in resolving syntactic ambiguity: Structural and semantic influences.

Kathryn Bousquet1, Tamara Y Swaab1, Debra L Long1.   

Abstract

Verb bias facilitates parsing of temporarily ambiguous sentences, but it is unclear when and how comprehenders use probabilistic knowledge about the combinatorial properties of verbs in context. In a self-paced reading experiment, participants read direct object/sentential complement sentences. Reading time in the critical region was investigated as a function of three forms of bias: structural bias (the frequency with which a verb appears in direct object/sentential complement sentences), lexical bias (the simple co-occurrence of verbs and other lexical items), and global bias (obtained from norming data about the use of verbs with specific noun phrases). For reading times at the critical word, structural bias was the only reliable predictor. However, global bias was superior to structural and lexical bias at the post-critical word and for offline acceptability ratings. The results suggest that structural information about verbs is available immediately, but that context-specific, semantic information becomes increasingly informative as processing proceeds.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Verb bias; local ambiguity; surprisal; syntactic complexity

Year:  2019        PMID: 32953924      PMCID: PMC7500530          DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2019.1622750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 2327-3798            Impact factor:   2.331


  18 in total

1.  Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences.

Authors:  Douglas Roland; Jeffrey L Elman; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2006-01

2.  Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: evidence from eye movements and word-by-word self-paced reading.

Authors:  F Ferreira; J M Henderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Processing temporary syntactic ambiguity: the effect of contextual bias.

Authors:  Mohamed Taha Mohamed; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  SUBTLEX-UK: a new and improved word frequency database for British English.

Authors:  Walter J B van Heuven; Pawel Mandera; Emmanuel Keuleers; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 5.  Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing.

Authors:  L Frazier
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1995-11

6.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths.

Authors:  J C Trueswell; M K Tanenhaus; C Kello
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  People Use their Knowledge of Common Events to Understand Language, and Do So as Quickly as Possible.

Authors:  Ken McRae; Kazunaga Matsuki
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2009-11

Review 8.  Trends in syntactic parsing: anticipation, Bayesian estimation, and good-enough parsing.

Authors:  Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Making simple sentences hard: Verb bias effects in simple direct object sentences.

Authors:  Michael P Wilson; Susan M Garnsey
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Structure before meaning: sentence processing, plausibility, and subcategorization.

Authors:  Johannes Kizach; Anne Mette Nyvad; Ken Ramshøj Christensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.