Literature DB >> 23136058

The crossover sign overestimates acetabular retroversion.

Ira Zaltz1, Bryan T Kelly, Iftach Hetsroni, Asheesh Bedi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The crossover sign is a radiographic finding associated with cranial acetabular retroversion and has been associated with pincer-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in patients with hip pain. Variable morphology, location, and size of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) may contribute to the crossover sign even in the absence of retroversion. Thus, the sign may overestimate the incidence of acetabular retroversion. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: Can the crossover sign appear on standardized, well-positioned AP pelvis radiographs despite the absence of acetabular retroversion? And what is the contribution of variable size and morphology of the AIIS to a crossover sign?
METHODS: We evaluated radiographs of 53 patients with symptomatic FAI in the absence of substantial chondral degenerative changes (< Tönnis Grade 2). Forty-one radiographs met the appropriate criteria of neutral tilt and obliquity. Three independent reviewers determined presence and location of the crossover sign. Acetabular version was defined using high-resolution three-dimensional CT. CT reconstructions were used to define three AIIS types addressing AIIS morphology.
RESULTS: Nineteen of 38 radiographs with a crossover sign on AP radiographs had focal or global acetabular retroversion on three-dimensional CT (positive and negative predictive values = 50%). In contrast, the AIIS extended to or below the level of the anterior superior acetabular rim and was partially or completely responsible for the appearance of a radiographic crossover sign in all 19 hips with an anteverted acetabulum. High interobserver reliability (kappa > 0.8) was found for AIIS types.
CONCLUSIONS: A crossover sign is frequently present on well-positioned AP pelvis radiographs in the absence of acetabular retroversion. Variable AIIS morphology may explain the appearance of this sign in the presence or absence of acetabular retroversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23136058      PMCID: PMC3705036          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2689-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  16 in total

1.  Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers.

Authors:  K A Siebenrock; D F Kalbermatten; R Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Analysis of acetabular version in the native hip: comparison between 2D axial CT and 3D CT measurements.

Authors:  Wael Dandachli; Saif Ul Islam; Richard Tippett; Margaret A Hall-Craggs; Johan D Witt
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Accuracy of pelvic flexion measurements from lateral radiographs.

Authors:  Kort Eckman; Mahmoud A Hafez; Frcs Ed; Branislav Jaramaz; Timothy J Levison; Anthony M Digioia
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the "cross-over-sign".

Authors:  Amir A Jamali; Kiril Mladenov; Dominik C Meyer; Alberto Martinez; Martin Beck; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Ischial spine projection into the pelvis : a new sign for acetabular retroversion.

Authors:  Fabian Kalberer; Rafael J Sierra; Sanjeev S Madan; Reinhold Ganz; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Three-dimensional CT analysis to determine acetabular retroversion and the implications for the management of femoro-acetabular impingement.

Authors:  W Dandachli; S Ul Islam; M Liu; R Richards; M Hall-Craggs; J Witt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-08

8.  Noninvasive three-dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Monika Kubiak-Langer; Frank Langlotz; Marc Puls; Stephen B Murphy; Klaus A Siebenrock
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  The ischial spine sign: does pelvic tilt and rotation matter?

Authors:  Diganta K Kakaty; Andreas F Fischer; Harish S Hosalkar; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Acetabular dome retroversion: radiological appearance, incidence and relevance.

Authors:  C Dora; M Leunig; M Beck; R Simovitch; R Ganz
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2006 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  46 in total

1.  Current concepts and trends for operative treatment of FAI: hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  Christopher M Larson; Rebecca M Stone
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-09

2.  Symposium: Advanced hip arthroscopy: editorial comment.

Authors:  Marc R Safran
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Can the crossover sign be a reliable marker of global retroversion of the acetabulum?

Authors:  Seyed Ali Hashemi; Javad Dehghani; Amir Reza Vosoughi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Inter- and intra-observer agreement of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) parameters comparing plain radiographs and advanced, 3D computed tomographic (CT)-generated hip models in a surgical patient cohort.

Authors:  Edwin R Cadet; Oladapo M Babatunde; Prakash Gorroochurn; Andrew K Chan; Agata Stancato-Pasik; Marc Brown; Skylar Johnson; Philip Burns Kaiser; Thomas R Gardner; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Clinical and morphologic factors associated with suture anchor refixation of labral tears in the hip.

Authors:  John A Ruder; Erin Magennis; Anil S Ranawat; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-12-03

6.  Arthroscopic acetabular rim resection in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  Roxanne M Chow; Aaron J Krych; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2013-09-08

Review 7.  [Impingement of the hip].

Authors:  F Schmaranzer; M Hanke; T Lerch; S Steppacher; K Siebenrock; M Tannast
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Surgical Technique: Arthroscopic Osteoplasty of Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Zachary T Sharfman; Alon Grundshtein; Matan Paret; Leah Amit; Eyal Amar; Ehud Rath
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-06-13

9.  How do acetabular version and femoral head coverage change with skeletal maturity?

Authors:  Andreas M Hingsammer; Sarah Bixby; David Zurakowski; Yi-Meng Yen; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Are normal hips being labeled as pathologic? A CT-based method for defining normal acetabular coverage.

Authors:  Christopher M Larson; Alexandre Moreau-Gaudry; Bryan T Kelly; J W Thomas Byrd; Jérôme Tonetti; Stephane Lavallee; Laurence Chabanas; Guillaume Barrier; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.