Literature DB >> 31587142

Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment.

Eric Racine1,2,3, M Ariel Cascio4,5, Marjorie Montreuil4,6, Aline Bogossian4,7.   

Abstract

Bioethics has made a compelling case for the role of experience and empirical research in ethics. This may explain why the movement for empirical ethics has such a firm grounding in bioethics. However, the theoretical framework according to which empirical research contributes to ethics-and the specific role(s) it can or should play-remains manifold and unclear. In this paper, we build from pragmatic theory stressing the importance of experience and outcomes in establishing the meaning of ethics concepts. We then propose three methodological steps according to which the meaning of ethics concepts can be refined based on experience and empirical research: (1) function identification, (2) function enrichment, and (3) function testing. These steps are explained and situated within the broader commitment of pragmatic ethics to a perspective of moral growth and human flourishing (eudaimonia). We hope that this proposal will give specific direction to the bridging of theoretical and empirical research in ethics and thus support stronger actualization of ethics concepts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Concept analysis; Dewey; Empirical ethics; Eudaimonia; Growth; Methods; Peirce; Pragmatism

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31587142     DOI: 10.1007/s11017-019-09502-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth        ISSN: 1386-7415


  88 in total

1.  What good is a pragmatic bioethic?

Authors:  Lisa Bellantoni
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec

2.  Symbiotic empirical ethics: a practical methodology.

Authors:  Lucy Frith
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  The FAD-Plus: measuring lay beliefs regarding free will and related constructs.

Authors:  Delroy L Paulhus; Jasmine M Carey
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2011-01

Review 4.  Two concepts of empirical ethics.

Authors:  Malcolm Parker
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 5.  The "Vulnerability" of Psychiatric Research Participants: Why This Research Ethics Concept Needs to Be Revisited.

Authors:  Dearbhail Bracken-Roche; Emily Bell; Eric Racine
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.356

6.  Instrumentalist Analyses of the Functions of Health Ethics Concepts and Principles: Methodological Guideposts.

Authors:  Eric Racine; M Ariel Cascio; Aline Bogossian
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 11.229

7.  Living well with dementia: enhancing dignity and quality of life, using a novel intervention, Dignity Therapy.

Authors:  Bridget Johnston; Sally Lawton; Catriona McCaw; Emma Law; Joyce Murray; John Gibb; Jan Pringle; Gillian Munro; Cesar Rodriguez
Journal:  Int J Older People Nurs       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.115

Review 8.  An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters.

Authors:  Gregory Makoul; Marla L Clayman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-07-26

Review 9.  A systematic review of empirical bioethics methodologies.

Authors:  Rachel Davies; Jonathan Ives; Michael Dunn
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment.

Authors:  Veljko Dubljević; Sebastian Sattler; Eric Racine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.