Literature DB >> 25740521

Cortical activity predicts which older adults recognize speech in noise and when.

Kenneth I Vaden1, Stefanie E Kuchinsky2, Jayne B Ahlstrom3, Judy R Dubno3, Mark A Eckert1.   

Abstract

Speech recognition in noise can be challenging for older adults and elicits elevated activity throughout a cingulo-opercular network that is hypothesized to monitor and modify behaviors to optimize performance. A word recognition in noise experiment was used to test the hypothesis that cingulo-opercular engagement provides performance benefit for older adults. Healthy older adults (N = 31; 50-81 years of age; mean pure tone thresholds <32 dB HL from 0.25 to 8 kHz, best ear; species: human) performed word recognition in multitalker babble at 2 signal-to-noise ratios (SNR = +3 or +10 dB) during a sparse sampling fMRI experiment. Elevated cingulo-opercular activity was associated with an increased likelihood of correct recognition on the following trial independently of SNR and performance on the preceding trial. The cingulo-opercular effect increased for participants with the best overall performance. These effects were lower for older adults compared with a younger, normal-hearing adult sample (N = 18). Visual cortex activity also predicted trial-level recognition for the older adults, which resulted from discrete decreases in activity before errors and occurred for the oldest adults with the poorest recognition. Participants demonstrating larger visual cortex effects also had reduced fractional anisotropy in an anterior portion of the left inferior frontal-occipital fasciculus, which projects between frontal and occipital regions where activity predicted word recognition. Together, the results indicate that older adults experience performance benefit from elevated cingulo-opercular activity, but not to the same extent as younger adults, and that declines in attentional control can limit word recognition.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/353929-09$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aging; attention; audition; control; perception; speech

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25740521      PMCID: PMC4348188          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2908-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  94 in total

Review 1.  Processing and visualization for diffusion tensor MRI.

Authors:  C-F Westin; S E Maier; H Mamata; A Nabavi; F A Jolesz; R Kikinis
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: a shrinking brain.

Authors:  Susan M Resnick; Dzung L Pham; Michael A Kraut; Alan B Zonderman; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Geodesic estimation for large deformation anatomical shape averaging and interpolation.

Authors:  Brian Avants; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Effects of divided attention on fMRI correlates of memory encoding.

Authors:  Melina R Uncapher; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Age-related changes in word retrieval: role of bilateral frontal and subcortical networks.

Authors:  Christina E Wierenga; Michelle Benjamin; Kaundinya Gopinath; William M Perlstein; Christiana M Leonard; Leslie J Gonzalez Rothi; Tim Conway; M Allison Cato; Richard Briggs; Bruce Crosson
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 6.  Top-down modulation and normal aging.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Anatomic dissection of the inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus revisited in the lights of brain stimulation data.

Authors:  Juan Martino; Christian Brogna; Santiago G Robles; Francesco Vergani; Hugues Duffau
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series.

Authors:  Paul M Macey; Katherine E Macey; Rajesh Kumar; Ronald M Harper
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Tract profiles of white matter properties: automating fiber-tract quantification.

Authors:  Jason D Yeatman; Robert F Dougherty; Nathaniel J Myall; Brian A Wandell; Heidi M Feldman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Lifespan maturation and degeneration of human brain white matter.

Authors:  Jason D Yeatman; Brian A Wandell; Aviv A Mezer
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  35 in total

1.  Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Susan E Teubner-Rhodes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Listening and Learning: Cognitive Contributions to the Rehabilitation of Older Adults With and Without Audiometrically Defined Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kristina C Backer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Is Listening in Noise Worth It? The Neurobiology of Speech Recognition in Challenging Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Kenneth I Vaden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Time-Compressed Speech Identification Is Predicted by Auditory Neural Processing, Perceptuomotor Speed, and Executive Functioning in Younger and Older Listeners.

Authors:  James W Dias; Carolyn M McClaskey; Kelly C Harris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

5.  Self-Assessed Hearing Handicap in Older Adults With Poorer-Than-Predicted Speech Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Effect of informational content of noise on speech representation in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Cingulo-opercular activity affects incidental memory encoding for speech in noise.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Listening under difficult conditions: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Yi Du; Lori J Bernstein; Thijs Barten; Karen Banai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 10.  Structural neuroimaging of the altered brain stemming from pediatric and adolescent hearing loss-Scientific and clinical challenges.

Authors:  J Tilak Ratnanather
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med       Date:  2019-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.