Literature DB >> 22500925

Multiple imputation of missing fMRI data in whole brain analysis.

Kenneth I Vaden1, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Stefanie E Kuchinsky, Mark A Eckert.   

Abstract

Whole brain fMRI analyses rarely include the entire brain because of missing data that result from data acquisition limits and susceptibility artifact, in particular. This missing data problem is typically addressed by omitting voxels from analysis, which may exclude brain regions that are of theoretical interest and increase the potential for Type II error at cortical boundaries or Type I error when spatial thresholds are used to establish significance. Imputation could significantly expand statistical map coverage, increase power, and enhance interpretations of fMRI results. We examined multiple imputation for group level analyses of missing fMRI data using methods that leverage the spatial information in fMRI datasets for both real and simulated data. Available case analysis, neighbor replacement, and regression based imputation approaches were compared in a general linear model framework to determine the extent to which these methods quantitatively (effect size) and qualitatively (spatial coverage) increased the sensitivity of group analyses. In both real and simulated data analysis, multiple imputation provided 1) variance that was most similar to estimates for voxels with no missing data, 2) fewer false positive errors in comparison to mean replacement, and 3) fewer false negative errors in comparison to available case analysis. Compared to the standard analysis approach of omitting voxels with missing data, imputation methods increased brain coverage in this study by 35% (from 33,323 to 45,071 voxels). In addition, multiple imputation increased the size of significant clusters by 58% and number of significant clusters across statistical thresholds, compared to the standard voxel omission approach. While neighbor replacement produced similar results, we recommend multiple imputation because it uses an informed sampling distribution to deal with missing data across subjects that can include neighbor values and other predictors. Multiple imputation is anticipated to be particularly useful for 1) large fMRI data sets with inconsistent missing voxels across subjects and 2) addressing the problem of increased artifact at ultra-high field, which significantly limit the extent of whole brain coverage and interpretations of results. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22500925      PMCID: PMC3328786          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  37 in total

1.  Simultaneous EEG and fMRI of the alpha rhythm.

Authors:  Robin I Goldman; John M Stern; Jerome Engel; Mark S Cohen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Geodesic estimation for large deformation anatomical shape averaging and interpolation.

Authors:  Brian Avants; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Word intelligibility and age predict visual cortex activity during word listening.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Kenneth I Vaden; Noam I Keren; Kelly C Harris; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Some issues in estimating the effect of prognostic factors from incomplete covariate data.

Authors:  W Vach
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997 Jan 15-Feb 15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Prediction of memory rehabilitation outcomes in traumatic brain injury by using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Gary E Strangman; Therese M O'Neil-Pirozzi; Richard Goldstein; Kalika Kelkar; Douglas I Katz; David Burke; Scott L Rauch; Cary R Savage; Mel B Glenn
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Ian R White; John B Carlin; Michael Spratt; Patrick Royston; Michael G Kenward; Angela M Wood; James R Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-29

8.  A method for removal of global effects from fMRI time series.

Authors:  Paul M Macey; Katherine E Macey; Rajesh Kumar; Ronald M Harper
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Bootstrap generation and evaluation of an fMRI simulation database.

Authors:  Pierre Bellec; Vincent Perlbarg; Alan C Evans
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  A comparison of classification methods for differentiating fronto-temporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease using FDG-PET imaging.

Authors:  Roger Higdon; Norman L Foster; Robert A Koeppe; Charles S DeCarli; William J Jagust; Christopher M Clark; Nancy R Barbas; Steven E Arnold; R Scott Turner; Judith L Heidebrink; Satoshi Minoshima
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  19 in total

1.  Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Susan E Teubner-Rhodes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  The cingulo-opercular network provides word-recognition benefit.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Stephanie L Cute; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Multi-task prediction of infant cognitive scores from longitudinal incomplete neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Ehsan Adeli; Yu Meng; Gang Li; Weili Lin; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Cortical activity predicts which older adults recognize speech in noise and when.

Authors:  Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Fronto-temporal connectivity predicts cognitive empathy deficits and experiential negative symptoms in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Samantha V Abram; Krista M Wisner; Jaclyn M Fox; Deanna M Barch; Lei Wang; John G Csernansky; Angus W MacDonald; Matthew J Smith
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Handedness- and brain size-related efficiency differences in small-world brain networks: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Meiling Li; Junping Wang; Feng Liu; Heng Chen; Fengmei Lu; Guorong Wu; Chunshui Yu; Huafu Chen
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2014-12-23

7.  The relationship between socioeconomic status and white matter microstructure in pre-reading children: A longitudinal investigation.

Authors:  Ola Ozernov-Palchik; Elizabeth S Norton; Yingying Wang; Sara D Beach; Jennifer Zuk; Maryanne Wolf; John D E Gabrieli; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Orthographic influence on spoken word identification: Behavioral and fMRI evidence.

Authors:  Christine Chiarello; Kenneth I Vaden; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Linear mixed-effects modeling approach to FMRI group analysis.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Ziad S Saad; Jennifer C Britton; Daniel S Pine; Robert W Cox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  SGPP: spatial Gaussian predictive process models for neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Jung Won Hyun; Yimei Li; John H Gilmore; Zhaohua Lu; Martin Styner; Hongtu Zhu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.