Literature DB >> 19649141

Two Dimensions Are Not Better than One: STREAK and the Univariate Signal Detection Model of Remember/Know Performance.

Jeffrey J Starns1, Roger Ratcliff.   

Abstract

We evaluated STREAK and the univariate signal detection model of Remember/Know (RK) judgments in terms of their ability to fit empirical data and produce psychologically meaningful parameter estimates. Participants studied pairs of words and completed item recognition tests with RK judgments as well as associative recognition tests. Fits to the RK data showed that the univariate model provided a better fit than STREAK for the majority of participants. Although associative recognition relies primarily on specific memory evidence for the association, both the global and specific memory strength estimates from STREAK strongly correlated with associative recognition performance, and the correlation was actually nominally stronger for global strength. Thus, STREAK did not fit the data as well as the univariate model and did not produce interpretable estimates of global and specific memory strength. The success of the univariate model suggests that RK judgments are based on a single conglomerate of all available memory evidence and do not reflect qualitatively different memory systems or processes.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19649141      PMCID: PMC2598428          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  20 in total

1.  Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: a two-dimensional signal-detection model.

Authors:  Caren M Rotello; Neil A Macmillan; John A Reeder
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Remember-know: a matter of confidence.

Authors:  John C Dunn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Vincent Stretch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

4.  Decision-making models of remember-know judgments: comment on Rotello, Macmillan, and Reeder (2004).

Authors:  Bennet Murdock
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.

Authors:  John T Wixted
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Colleen M Parks
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 7.  The dimensionality of the remember-know task: a state-trace analysis.

Authors:  John C Dunn
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  A P Yonelinas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

9.  Evaluating models of remember-know judgments: complexity, mimicry, and discriminability.

Authors:  Andrew L Cohen; Caren M Rotello; Neil A Macmillan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

10.  Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  13 in total

1.  Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A demonstration that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  C Brock Kirwan; John T Wixted; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Familiarity and conceptual implicit memory: Individual differences and neural correlates.

Authors:  Wei-Chun Wang; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.065

4.  The medial temporal lobe and the attributes of memory.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Effects of aging and IQ on item and associative memory.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Anjali Thapar; Gail McKoon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-08

6.  Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong.

Authors:  Katherine M Ingram; Laura Mickes; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Continuous recollection versus unitized familiarity in associative recognition.

Authors:  Laura Mickes; Emily M Johnson; John T Wixted
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability.

Authors:  Joshua D Koen; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  A single trial analysis of EEG in recognition memory: Tracking the neural correlates of memory strength.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Per B Sederberg; Troy A Smith; Russ Childers
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Familiarity is related to conceptual implicit memory: an examination of individual differences.

Authors:  Wei-chun Wang; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.