Literature DB >> 17723031

Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: a review.

Andrew P Yonelinas1, Colleen M Parks.   

Abstract

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is being used increasingly to examine the memory processes underlying recognition memory. The authors discuss the methodological issues involved in conducting and analyzing ROC results, describe the various models that have been developed to account for these results, review the behavioral empirical literature, and assess the models in light of those results. The empirical literature includes studies of item recognition, relational recognition (e.g., source and associative tests), as well as exclusion and remember-know tasks. Nine empirical regularities are described, and a number of unresolved empirical issues are identified. The results indicate that several common classes of recognition models, such as pure threshold and pure signal detection models, are inadequate to account for recognition memory, whereas several hybrid models that incorporate a signal detection-based process and a threshold recollection or attention process are in better agreement with the results. The results indicate that there are at least 2 functionally distinct component/processes underlying recognition memory. In addition, the ROC results have various implications for how recognition memory performance should be measured. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17723031     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  132 in total

1.  Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Two processes support visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Sebastian Guderian; Danielle Brigham; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Production benefits both recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Jason D Ozubko; Nigel Gopie; Colin M MacLeod
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

4.  The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

5.  Recognition confidence under violated and confirmed memory expectations.

Authors:  Antonio Jaeger; Justin C Cox; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2011-10-03

6.  Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.

Authors:  Lisa H Evans; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Toward a complete decision model of item and source recognition: A discrete-state approach.

Authors:  Karl Christoph Klauer; David Kellen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

8.  Latent mnemonic strengths are latent: a comment on Mickes, Wixted, and Wais (2007).

Authors:  Jeffrey N Rouder; Michael S Pratte; Richard D Morey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

9.  Medial prefrontal cortex supports recollection, but not familiarity, in the rat.

Authors:  Anja Farovik; Laura M Dupont; Miguel Arce; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Distinguishing between the success and precision of recollection.

Authors:  Iain M Harlow; Andrew P Yonelinas
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2014-12-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.