Literature DB >> 19966306

A demonstration that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity.

C Brock Kirwan1, John T Wixted, Larry R Squire.   

Abstract

Recognition memory is thought to depend on two distinct processes: recollection and familiarity. There is debate as to whether damage to the hippocampus selectively impairs recollection or whether it impairs both recollection and familiarity. If hippocampal damage selectively impairs recollection but leaves familiarity intact, then patients with circumscribed hippocampal lesions should exhibit the full normal range of low-confidence and high-confidence familiarity-based recognition. High-confidence, familiarity-based decisions are ordinarily accompanied by successful recollection (when memory is intact). However, patients with hippocampal lesions, if recollection is impaired, should frequently experience high-confidence, familiarity-based recognition in the absence of recollection, and this circumstance (termed the "butcher-on-the-bus" phenomenon) should occur more often in patients than in healthy controls. We tested five patients with circumscribed hippocampal damage, asking them to recognize recently studied words as well as to remember the context in which the items were studied. Relative to controls, the patients exhibited no increased tendency to experience the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon. The simplest explanation of the results is that hippocampal damage impairs familiarity as well as recollection. The same conclusion was suggested when two competing models of recognition memory were used to analyze the data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19966306      PMCID: PMC2806702          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0912543107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  Source ROCs are (typically) curvilinear: comment on Yonelinas (1999).

Authors:  J Qin; C L Raye; M K Johnson; K J Mitchell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  In defense of the signal detection interpretation of remember/know judgments.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Vincent Stretch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08

4.  Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Chad S Dodson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-01

5.  Item memory, source memory, and the medial temporal lobe: concordant findings from fMRI and memory-impaired patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gold; Christine N Smith; Peter J Bayley; Yael Shrager; James B Brewer; Craig E L Stark; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: a new perspective.

Authors:  Larry R Squire; John T Wixted; Robert E Clark
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 7.  The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory.

Authors:  H Eichenbaum; A P Yonelinas; C Ranganath
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 12.449

8.  Quantifying medial temporal lobe damage in memory-impaired patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gold; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Testing signal-detection models of yes/no and two-alternative forced-choice recognition memory.

Authors:  Yoonhee Jang; John T Wixted; David E Huber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-05

10.  Remembering and knowing: two different expressions of declarative memory.

Authors:  B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  20 in total

1.  Evidence for functional specialization of hippocampal subfields detected by MR subfield volumetry on high resolution images at 4 T.

Authors:  S G Mueller; L L Chao; B Berman; M W Weiner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  The medial temporal lobe and the attributes of memory.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Memory Retrieval in Mice and Men.

Authors:  Aya Ben-Yakov; Yadin Dudai; Mark R Mayford
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  The familiarity/recollection distinction does not illuminate medial temporal lobe function: response to Montaldi and Mayes.

Authors:  John T Wixted; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Neural correlates of familiarity-based associative retrieval.

Authors:  Jaclyn Hennessey Ford; Mieke Verfaellie; Kelly S Giovanello
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Impaired capacity for familiarity after hippocampal damage.

Authors:  Zhuang Song; John T Wixted; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dynamics of brain activity reveal a unitary recognition signal.

Authors:  Christoph T Weidemann; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong.

Authors:  Christine N Smith; John T Wixted; Larry R Squire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Medial temporal lobe function and recognition memory: a novel approach to separating the contribution of recollection and familiarity.

Authors:  Zhuang Song; Annette Jeneson; Larry R Squire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The human hippocampus contributes to both the recollection and familiarity components of recognition memory.

Authors:  Maxwell B Merkow; John F Burke; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.