Literature DB >> 17227185

Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory.

John T Wixted1.   

Abstract

Two influential models of recognition memory, the unequal-variance signal-detection model and a dual-process threshold/detection model, accurately describe the receiver operating characteristic, but only the latter model can provide estimates of recollection and familiarity. Such estimates often accord with those provided by the remember-know procedure, and both methods are now widely used in the neuroscience literature to identify the brain correlates of recollection and familiarity. However, in recent years, a substantial literature has accumulated directly contrasting the signal-detection model against the threshold/detection model, and that literature is almost unanimous in its endorsement of signal-detection theory. A dual-process version of signal-detection theory implies that individual recognition decisions are not process pure, and it suggests new ways to investigate the brain correlates of recognition memory. ((c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17227185     DOI: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0033-295X            Impact factor:   8.934


  267 in total

1.  Medial prefrontal cortex supports source memory accuracy for self-referenced items.

Authors:  Eric D Leshikar; Audrey Duarte
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.083

2.  Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Two processes support visual recognition memory in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Sebastian Guderian; Danielle Brigham; Mortimer Mishkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

5.  Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.

Authors:  Lisa H Evans; Edward L Wilding
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: the evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Corey N White; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-11

7.  Parallel psychometric and cognitive modeling analyses of the Penn Face Memory Test in the Army Study to Assess Risk and Resilience in Servicemembers.

Authors:  Michael L Thomas; Gregory G Brown; Ruben C Gur; John A Hansen; Matthew K Nock; Steven Heeringa; Robert J Ursano; Murray B Stein
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.475

8.  Impact of Fetal-Neonatal Iron Deficiency on Recognition Memory at 2 Months of Age.

Authors:  Fengji Geng; Xiaoqin Mai; Jianying Zhan; Lin Xu; Zhengyan Zhao; Michael Georgieff; Jie Shao; Betsy Lozoff
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Conceptual fluency at test shifts recognition response bias in Alzheimer's disease: implications for increased false recognition.

Authors:  Carl A Gold; Natalie L Marchant; Wilma Koutstaal; Daniel L Schacter; Andrew E Budson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Medial prefrontal cortex supports recollection, but not familiarity, in the rat.

Authors:  Anja Farovik; Laura M Dupont; Miguel Arce; Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.