Literature DB >> 19647457

R: A quantitative measure of NMR signal receiving efficiency.

Huaping Mo1, John Harwood, Shucha Zhang, Yi Xue, Robert Santini, Daniel Raftery.   

Abstract

Recognizing that the sensitivity of NMR is influenced by factors such as conductance and dielectric constant of the sample, we propose the receiving efficiency R to characterize how efficiently the NMR signal can be observed from a unit transverse magnetization in a sample under optimal probe tuning and matching conditions. Conveniently, the relative receiving efficiency can be defined as the ratio of the NMR signal induced by a unit transverse magnetization in a sample of interest and a reference solution. Based on the reciprocal relationship between excitation and observation in NMR, the relative receiving efficiency can be correlated with the 90 degrees pulse length (tau(90)). In the special case of perfect probe tuning (impedance matched to 50 Omega), R is inversely proportional to tau(90). Application of the NMR receiving efficiency in quantitative analysis potentially enables a single external concentration reference for almost any sample, eliminating the need to know its exact chemical composition or detailed electromagnetic properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19647457      PMCID: PMC2745519          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  12 in total

1.  The NMR reciprocity theorem for arbitrary probe geometry.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Mapping the B1 field distribution with nonideal gradients in a high-resolution NMR spectrometer.

Authors:  A Jerschow; G Bodenhausen
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Accurate quantitative 13C NMR spectroscopy: repeatability over time of site-specific 13C isotope ratio determination.

Authors:  Elsa Caytan; Eliot P Botosoa; Virginie Silvestre; Richard J Robins; Serge Akoka; Gérald S Remaud
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2007-09-28       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Measuring protein concentrations by NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Gerhard Wider; Lars Dreier
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  An alternative tuning approach to enhance NMR signals.

Authors:  Denis J-Y Marion; Hervé Desvaux
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-04-20       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Analysis and implications of transition-band signals in high-resolution NMR.

Authors:  C Szántay
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Concentration Measurement by Proton NMR Using the ERETIC Method.

Authors:  S Akoka; L Barantin; M Trierweiler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Automatic probe tuning and matching.

Authors:  F Hwang; D I Hoult
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Generalized reciprocity.

Authors:  E K Insko; M A Elliott; J C Schotland; J S Leigh
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Low-conductivity buffers for high-sensitivity NMR measurements.

Authors:  Alexander E Kelly; Horng D Ou; Richard Withers; Volker Dötsch
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2002-10-09       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  9 in total

1.  NMR quantitation: influence of RF inhomogeneity.

Authors:  Huaping Mo; John Harwood; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Magn Reson Chem       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 2.  Can NMR solve some significant challenges in metabolomics?

Authors:  G A Nagana Gowda; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  A quick diagnostic test for NMR receiver gain compression.

Authors:  Huaping Mo; John S Harwood; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Magn Reson Chem       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Obesity and type 2 diabetes in rats are associated with altered brain glycogen and amino-acid homeostasis.

Authors:  Helle M Sickmann; Helle S Waagepetersen; Arne Schousboe; Andrew J Benie; Stephan D Bouman
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  "Add to subtract": a simple method to remove complex background signals from the 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of mixtures.

Authors:  Tao Ye; Cheng Zheng; Shucha Zhang; G A Nagana Gowda; Olga Vitek; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Receiver gain function: the actual NMR receiver gain.

Authors:  Huaping Mo; John S Harwood; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Magn Reson Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Simultaneous quantification and identification of individual chemicals in metabolite mixtures by two-dimensional extrapolated time-zero (1)H-(13)C HSQC (HSQC(0)).

Authors:  Kaifeng Hu; William M Westler; John L Markley
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  "Invisible" conformers of an antifungal disulfide protein revealed by constrained cold and heat unfolding, CEST-NMR experiments, and molecular dynamics calculations.

Authors:  Ádám Fizil; Zoltán Gáspári; Terézia Barna; Florentine Marx; Gyula Batta
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.236

9.  Signal Deconvolution and Noise Factor Analysis Based on a Combination of Time-Frequency Analysis and Probabilistic Sparse Matrix Factorization.

Authors:  Shunji Yamada; Atsushi Kurotani; Eisuke Chikayama; Jun Kikuchi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.