Literature DB >> 20812219

A quick diagnostic test for NMR receiver gain compression.

Huaping Mo1, John S Harwood, Daniel Raftery.   

Abstract

Modern NMR spectrometers require receivers to work within their linear ranges to maintain high fidelity line shape and peak integration. For better sensitivity, the receiver gain has to be optimized to detect dilute analytes; however, gain compression needs to be avoided. Here, we explore if and how linear receiver performance can be achieved for a couple of representative gain settings on a spectrometer. In the case of slight receiver gain compression, not only will the peak integral be attenuated but a very small line-shape change can also be observed. Hence, we can resort to resonance integration and line-shape analysis for gain compression diagnosis. As such, NMR signals, regardless of their observed amplitude difference in frequency domain, can be accurately compared in quantitative analysis. 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20812219      PMCID: PMC2943987          DOI: 10.1002/mrc.2662

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Chem        ISSN: 0749-1581            Impact factor:   2.447


  9 in total

1.  Nuclear-magnetic-resonance line-shape theory in the presence of radiation damping.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1994-06-01

2.  NMR measurements of diffusion in concentrated samples: avoiding problems with radiation damping.

Authors:  Mark A Connell; Adrain L Davis; Alan M Kenwright; Gareth A Morris
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.142

3.  Determination of analyte concentration using the residual solvent resonance in (1)H NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Gregory K Pierens; Anthony R Carroll; Rohan A Davis; Meredith E Palframan; Ronald J Quinn
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 4.050

4.  Concentration Measurement by Proton NMR Using the ERETIC Method.

Authors:  S Akoka; L Barantin; M Trierweiler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Metabolic profiling, metabolomic and metabonomic procedures for NMR spectroscopy of urine, plasma, serum and tissue extracts.

Authors:  Olaf Beckonert; Hector C Keun; Timothy M D Ebbels; Jacob Bundy; Elaine Holmes; John C Lindon; Jeremy K Nicholson
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  NMR quantitation of natural products at the nanomole scale.

Authors:  Doralyn S Dalisay; Tadeusz F Molinski
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.050

7.  R: A quantitative measure of NMR signal receiving efficiency.

Authors:  Huaping Mo; John Harwood; Shucha Zhang; Yi Xue; Robert Santini; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Receiver gain function: the actual NMR receiver gain.

Authors:  Huaping Mo; John S Harwood; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Magn Reson Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Solvent signal as an NMR concentration reference.

Authors:  Huaping Mo; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Can NMR solve some significant challenges in metabolomics?

Authors:  G A Nagana Gowda; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Signal Deconvolution and Noise Factor Analysis Based on a Combination of Time-Frequency Analysis and Probabilistic Sparse Matrix Factorization.

Authors:  Shunji Yamada; Atsushi Kurotani; Eisuke Chikayama; Jun Kikuchi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.923

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.