Literature DB >> 20063326

Receiver gain function: the actual NMR receiver gain.

Huaping Mo1, John S Harwood, Daniel Raftery.   

Abstract

The observed NMR signal size depends on the receiver gain parameter. We propose a receiver gain function to characterize how much the raw FID is amplified by the receiver as a function of the receiver gain setting. Although the receiver is linear for a fixed gain setting, the actual gain of the receiver may differ from what the gain setting suggests. Nevertheless, for a given receiver, we demonstrate that the receiver gain function can be calibrated. Such a calibration enables accurate comparison of separately acquired NMR signals in quantitative analysis, which frequently requires different receiver gain settings to avoid receiver saturation or achieve optimum sensitivity. The application of receiver gain function, along with the definition of receiving efficiency, allows easy concentration determination by a single internal or external concentration reference. Copyright (c) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20063326      PMCID: PMC3071559          DOI: 10.1002/mrc.2563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Chem        ISSN: 0749-1581            Impact factor:   2.447


  5 in total

1.  Determination of analyte concentration using the residual solvent resonance in (1)H NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Gregory K Pierens; Anthony R Carroll; Rohan A Davis; Meredith E Palframan; Ronald J Quinn
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 4.050

2.  Concentration Measurement by Proton NMR Using the ERETIC Method.

Authors:  S Akoka; L Barantin; M Trierweiler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  NMR quantitation of natural products at the nanomole scale.

Authors:  Doralyn S Dalisay; Tadeusz F Molinski
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.050

4.  R: A quantitative measure of NMR signal receiving efficiency.

Authors:  Huaping Mo; John Harwood; Shucha Zhang; Yi Xue; Robert Santini; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 2.229

5.  Solvent signal as an NMR concentration reference.

Authors:  Huaping Mo; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.986

  5 in total
  9 in total

1.  Parahydrogen-Induced Polarization of 1-13C-Acetates and 1-13C-Pyruvates Using Sidearm Hydrogenation of Vinyl, Allyl, and Propargyl Esters.

Authors:  Oleg G Salnikov; Nikita V Chukanov; Roman V Shchepin; Isaac V Manzanera Esteve; Kirill V Kovtunov; Igor V Koptyug; Eduard Y Chekmenev
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 4.126

Review 2.  Can NMR solve some significant challenges in metabolomics?

Authors:  G A Nagana Gowda; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  A quick diagnostic test for NMR receiver gain compression.

Authors:  Huaping Mo; John S Harwood; Daniel Raftery
Journal:  Magn Reson Chem       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Validation of a generic quantitative (1)H NMR method for natural products analysis.

Authors:  Tanja Gödecke; José G Napolitano; María F Rodríguez-Brasco; Shao-Nong Chen; Birgit U Jaki; David C Lankin; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  Phytochem Anal       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 3.373

Review 5.  Quantitative 1H NMR. Development and potential of an analytical method: an update.

Authors:  Guido F Pauli; Tanja Gödecke; Birgit U Jaki; David C Lankin
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 4.050

Review 6.  Importance of purity evaluation and the potential of quantitative ¹H NMR as a purity assay.

Authors:  Guido F Pauli; Shao-Nong Chen; Charlotte Simmler; David C Lankin; Tanja Gödecke; Birgit U Jaki; J Brent Friesen; James B McAlpine; José G Napolitano
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Signal Deconvolution and Noise Factor Analysis Based on a Combination of Time-Frequency Analysis and Probabilistic Sparse Matrix Factorization.

Authors:  Shunji Yamada; Atsushi Kurotani; Eisuke Chikayama; Jun Kikuchi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Signal intensities derived from different NMR probes and parameters contribute to variations in quantification of metabolites.

Authors:  Paige Lacy; Ryan T McKay; Michael Finkel; Alla Karnovsky; Scott Woehler; Michael J Lewis; David Chang; Kathleen A Stringer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Real-Life Reproducibility Assessment for NMR Metabolomics.

Authors:  Cristina Stavarache; Alina Nicolescu; Cătălin Duduianu; Gabriela Liliana Ailiesei; Mihaela Balan-Porcăraşu; Mihaela Cristea; Ana-Maria Macsim; Oana Popa; Carmen Stavarache; Anca Hîrtopeanu; Lucica Barbeş; Raluca Stan; Horia Iovu; Calin Deleanu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-22
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.