Literature DB >> 12358548

Low-conductivity buffers for high-sensitivity NMR measurements.

Alexander E Kelly1, Horng D Ou, Richard Withers, Volker Dötsch.   

Abstract

The sensitivity of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) probes, especially the recently introduced cryogenic probes, can be substantially reduced by the electrical noise generated by conductive samples. In particular, samples of biological macromolecules, which usually contain salts to keep the pH constant and to prevent aggregation, can experience a significant reduction in sensitivity. So far this dependence has forced researchers to minimize the salt concentrations in their samples. Here we demonstrate that the decisive factor is not the salt concentration itself but the conductivity which is a function of both the concentration and the mobility of the ions in solution. We show that by choosing buffers with low ionic mobility, the sample conductivity can be dramatically reduced and the sensitivity substantially enhanced compared to the same measurement with an equal concentration of a standard NMR buffer such as phosphate. We further show that the highest sensitivity gain of one buffer over another buffer is equal to the square root of the ratio of their ion mobilities and describe a simple method to evaluate the effect of a certain buffer on the sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12358548     DOI: 10.1021/ja026121b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  46 in total

1.  Signal enhancement in protein NMR using the spin-noise tuning optimum.

Authors:  Martin Nausner; Michael Goger; Eli Bendet-Taicher; Judith Schlagnitweit; Alexej Jerschow; Norbert Müller
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  Loss of T cell antigen recognition arising from changes in peptide and major histocompatibility complex protein flexibility: implications for vaccine design.

Authors:  Francis K Insaidoo; Oleg Y Borbulevych; Moushumi Hossain; Sujatha M Santhanagopolan; Tiffany K Baxter; Brian M Baker
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Aqueous sample in an EPR cavity: sensitivity considerations.

Authors:  Yuri E Nesmelov; Anand Gopinath; David D Thomas
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Backbone 1H, 15N, and 13C resonance assignments for the NOXO1β PX domain.

Authors:  Nicole Y Davis; Linda C McPhail; David A Horita
Journal:  Biomol NMR Assign       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 0.746

5.  Actin binding to the central domain of WASP/Scar proteins plays a critical role in the activation of the Arp2/3 complex.

Authors:  Alexander E Kelly; Heather Kranitz; Volker Dötsch; R Dyche Mullins
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Performance of cryogenic probes as a function of ionic strength and sample tube geometry.

Authors:  Markus W Voehler; Galen Collier; John K Young; Michael P Stone; Markus W Germann
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Sensitivity and resolution enhancement in solid-state NMR spectroscopy of bicelles.

Authors:  Sergey V Dvinskikh; Kazutoshi Yamamoto; Ulrich H N Dürr; Ayyalusamy Ramamoorthy
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 8.  NMR-based investigations into target DNA search processes of proteins.

Authors:  Junji Iwahara; Levani Zandarashvili; Catherine A Kemme; Alexandre Esadze
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.608

9.  Efficient production of isotopically labeled proteins by cell-free synthesis: a practical protocol.

Authors:  Takuya Torizawa; Masato Shimizu; Masato Taoka; Hiroshi Miyano; Masatsune Kainosho
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.835

10.  A general and efficient approach for NMR studies of peptide dynamics in class I MHC peptide binding grooves.

Authors:  Francis K Insaidoo; Jaroslav Zajicek; Brian M Baker
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.