Literature DB >> 19645706

Sociodemographic differences in early access to liver transplantation services.

C L Bryce1, D C Angus, R M Arnold, C-C H Chang, M H Farrell, C Manzarbeitia, I R Marino, M S Roberts.   

Abstract

The question of whether health care inequities occur before patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) are waitlisted for transplantation has not previously been assessed. To determine the impact of gender, race and insurance on access to transplantation, we linked Pennsylvania sources of data regarding adult patients discharged from nongovernmental hospitals from 1994 to 2001. We followed the patients through 2003 and linked information to records from five centers responsible for 95% of liver transplants in Pennsylvania during this period. Using multinomial logistic regressions, we estimated probabilities that patients would undergo transplant evaluation, transplant waitlisting and transplantation itself. Of the 144,507 patients in the study, 4361 (3.0%) underwent transplant evaluation. Of those evaluated, 3071 (70.4%) were waitlisted. Of those waitlisted, 1537 (50.0%) received a transplant. Overall, 57,020 (39.5%) died during the study period. Patients were less likely to undergo evaluation, waitlisting and transplantation if they were women, black and lacked commercial insurance (p < 0.001 each). Differences were more pronounced for early stages (evaluation and listing) than for the transplantation stage (in which national oversight and review occur). For early management and treatment decisions of patients with ESLD to be better understood, more comprehensive data concerning referral and listing practices are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19645706      PMCID: PMC2880404          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02737.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  19 in total

1.  Transforming objectivity to promote equity in transplant candidate selection.

Authors:  R A Majeske
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1996-03

2.  A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts.

Authors:  M Malinchoc; P S Kamath; F D Gordon; C J Peine; J Rank; P C ter Borg
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Criteria for evaluating potential transplant recipients vary among centers, physicians.

Authors:  T Randall
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Jun 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Liver transplantation. Patient selection and organ allocation.

Authors:  J F Trotter; J G Fitz; P A Clavien
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug

5.  The hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Results from the pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study.

Authors:  M J Fine; L J Hough; A R Medsger; Y H Li; E M Ricci; D E Singer; T J Marrie; C M Coley; M B Walsh; M Karpf; K C Lahive; W N Kapoor
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-01-13

6.  A statewide, population-based, time series analysis of access to liver transplantation.

Authors:  J E Tuttle-Newhall; R Rutledge; M Johnson; J Fair
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-01-27       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Public perceptions of the importance of prognosis in allocating transplantable livers to children.

Authors:  P A Ubel; G Loewenstein
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1996 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers.

Authors:  Russell Wiesner; Erick Edwards; Richard Freeman; Ann Harper; Ray Kim; Patrick Kamath; Walter Kremers; John Lake; Todd Howard; Robert M Merion; Robert A Wolfe; Ruud Krom
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.

Authors:  Cynthia A Moylan; Carla W Brady; Jeffrey L Johnson; Alastair D Smith; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Andrew J Muir
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women, and the poor.

Authors:  G C Alexander; A R Sehgal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-10-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  37 in total

1.  Reduced Access to Liver Transplantation in Women: Role of Height, MELD Exception Scores, and Renal Function Underestimation.

Authors:  Alina M Allen; Julie K Heimbach; Joseph J Larson; Kristin C Mara; W Ray Kim; Patrick S Kamath; Terry M Therneau
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  What liver transplant outcomes can be expected in the uninsured who become insured via the Affordable Care Act?

Authors:  L N Glueckert; D Redden; M A Thompson; A Haque; S H Gray; J Locke; D E Eckhoff; M Fouad; D A DuBay
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Ethnic disparities in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Nyingi Kemmer
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2011-05

Review 4.  Gender-based disparities in access to and outcomes of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Omobonike O Oloruntoba; Cynthia A Moylan
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

5.  Change in Health Insurance Coverage After Liver Transplantation Can Be Associated with Worse Outcomes.

Authors:  Clifford Akateh; Dmitry Tumin; Eliza W Beal; Khalid Mumtaz; Joseph D Tobias; Don Hayes; Sylvester M Black
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Patients with Alcoholic Liver Disease Have Worse Functional Status at Time of Liver Transplant Registration and Greater Waitlist and Post-transplant Mortality Which Is Compounded by Older Age.

Authors:  Patrick McCabe; Artin Galoosian; Robert J Wong
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Evaluation of Alcohol Taxes as a Public Health Opportunity to Reduce Liver Transplant Listings for Alcohol-Related Liver Disease.

Authors:  Nicole T Shen; Jeremy Bray; Nabeel A Wahid; Michael Raver; Nicholas Hutchison; Robert S Brown; Bruce R Schackman
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Impact of insurance type on eligibility for advanced heart failure therapies and survival.

Authors:  Sarah Streeter Hutcheson; Victoria Phillips; Rachel Patzer; Andrew Smith; J David Vega; Alanna A Morris
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.863

9.  Insurance Type and Solid Organ Transplantation Outcomes: A Historical Perspective on How Medicaid Expansion Might Impact Transplantation Outcomes.

Authors:  Derek A DuBay; Paul A MacLennan; Rhiannon D Reed; Brittany A Shelton; David T Redden; Mona Fouad; Michelle Y Martin; Stephen H Gray; Jared A White; Devin E Eckhoff; Jayme E Locke
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Use of Population-based Data to Demonstrate How Waitlist-based Metrics Overestimate Geographic Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant Care.

Authors:  D S Goldberg; B French; G Sahota; A E Wallace; J D Lewis; S D Halpern
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.