Literature DB >> 9777814

Barriers to cadaveric renal transplantation among blacks, women, and the poor.

G C Alexander1, A R Sehgal.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Cadaveric renal transplantation rates differ greatly by race, sex, and income. Previous efforts to lessen these differences have focused on the transplant waiting list. However, the transplantation process involves a series of steps related to medical suitability, interest in transplantation, pretransplant workup, and movement up a waiting list to eventual transplantation.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative importance of each step in explaining differences in cadaveric renal transplantation rates.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING AND PATIENTS: A total of 7125 patients beginning long-term dialysis between January 1993 and December 1996 in Indiana, Kentucky, and Ohio. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Completion of 4 separate steps during each patient-year of follow-up: (A) being medically suitable and possibly interested in transplantation; (B) being definitely interested in transplantation; (C) completing the pretransplant workup; and (D) moving up a waiting list and receiving a transplant.
RESULTS: Compared with whites, blacks were less likely to complete steps B (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.76), C (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.48-0.65), and D (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.40-0.62) after adjustment for age, sex, cause of renal failure, years receiving dialysis, and median income of patient ZIP code. Compared with men, women were less likely to complete each of the 4 steps, with ORs of 0.90, 0.89, 0.80, and 0.82, respectively. Poor individuals were less likely than wealthy individuals to complete steps A, B, and C, with ORs of 0.67, 0.78, and 0.77, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Barriers at several steps are responsible for sociodemographic differences in access to cadaveric renal transplantation. Efforts to allocate kidneys equitably must address each step of the transplant process.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9777814     DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.13.1148

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  139 in total

1.  Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation--clinically appropriate or due to underuse or overuse?

Authors:  A M Epstein; J Z Ayanian; J H Keogh; S J Noonan; N Armistead; P D Cleary; J S Weissman; J A David-Kasdan; D Carlson; J Fuller; D Marsh; R M Conti
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A trend analysis of organ transplantation among ethnic groups.

Authors:  Hong Xiao; Ellen S Campbell; Kai-Sheng Song
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Markers of access to and quality of primary care for aboriginal people in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Baiju R Shah; Nadia Gunraj; Janet E Hux
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, and renal replacement therapy in the Trent Region, United Kingdom 2000: an ecological study.

Authors:  R Maheswaran; N Payne; D Meechan; R P Burden; P R Fryers; J Wight; A Hutchinson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Healthcare system interventions for inequality in quality: corrective action through evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  William F Owen; Lynda A Szczech; Diane L Frankenfield
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Transplantation: the global role of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia Garcia; Paul Harden; Jeremy R Chapman
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 7.  How should we use age to ration health care? Lessons from the case of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Arthur L Caplan; Roy D Bloom; Peter L Abt; Jason H Karlawish
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Enhancing the expanded criteria donor policy as an intervention to improve kidney allocation: is it actually a 'net-zero' model?

Authors:  J D Schold; Y N Hall
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Gender imbalance in living organ donation.

Authors:  Nikola Biller-Andorno
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2002

10.  Mistrust, misperceptions, and miscommunication: a qualitative study of preferences about kidney transplantation among African Americans.

Authors:  M W Wachterman; E P McCarthy; E R Marcantonio; M Ersek
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.066

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.