Literature DB >> 29620614

Reduced Access to Liver Transplantation in Women: Role of Height, MELD Exception Scores, and Renal Function Underestimation.

Alina M Allen1, Julie K Heimbach2, Joseph J Larson3, Kristin C Mara3, W Ray Kim4, Patrick S Kamath1, Terry M Therneau3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sex-based disparities in liver transplantation (LT) are incompletely understood. We assessed the role of height, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), MELD-Na, and exception points in the disparate access to LT.
METHODS: Adults waitlisted for LT at Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network between 2002 and 2013 were included. Covariates associated with likelihood of LT were analyzed by Cox proportional model. In a separate cohort of waitlisted adults with glomerular filtration rate measurement by iothalamate clearance (n = 611), we determined the number of creatinine-derived MELD points in men versus women, across all ranges of glomerular filtration rate. The impact of correcting the MELD score deficit in women on LT was modeled.
RESULTS: Among 90 720 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registrants, women had higher mortality than men (4 years after listing: 22% vs 18%, P < 0.0001), and lower likelihood of LT (49% vs 58%, P < 0.0001); women were 20% less likely to be transplanted (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.81). Differences in height and MELD exception scores accounted for most of the LT deficit in women (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.94). Women received between 1 and 2.4 fewer creatinine-derived MELD points than men with similar renal dysfunction. MELD-Na worsened the gender disparity. Addition of 1 or 2 MELD points to women significantly impacted LT access.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in height and MELD exception points explained most of the sex-based disparity in LT. Additionally, MELD score underestimated disease severity in women by up to 2.4 points and MELD Na exacerbated this disparity. The degree of underestimation based on MELD had significant impact on allocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29620614      PMCID: PMC6153066          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  19 in total

1.  Increasing disparity in waitlist mortality rates with increased model for end-stage liver disease scores for candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma versus candidates without hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  David Goldberg; Benjamin French; Peter Abt; Sandy Feng; Andrew M Cameron
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Deceased-Donor Liver Size and the Sex-Based Disparity in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Mary G Bowring; Jessica M Ruck; Christine E Haugen; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Hepatocellular carcinoma patients are advantaged in the current liver transplant allocation system.

Authors:  K Washburn; E Edwards; A Harper; R Freeman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Female liver transplant recipients with the same GFR as male recipients have lower MELD scores--a systematic bias.

Authors:  E Cholongitas; L Marelli; A Kerry; D W Goodier; D Nair; M Thomas; D Patch; A K Burroughs
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Height contributes to the gender difference in wait-list mortality under the MELD-based liver allocation system.

Authors:  J C Lai; N A Terrault; E Vittinghoff; S W Biggins
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Gender, renal function, and outcomes on the liver transplant waiting list: assessment of revised MELD including estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Robert P Myers; Abdel Aziz M Shaheen; Alexander I Aspinall; Robert R Quinn; Kelly W Burak
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Impact of estimated liver volume and liver weight on gender disparity in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ayse L Mindikoglu; Sukru H Emre; Laurence S Magder
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 5.799

8.  Is the corrected-creatinine model for end-stage liver disease a feasible strategy to adjust gender difference in organ allocation for liver transplantation?

Authors:  Samantha C Huo; Teh-Ia Huo; Han-Chieh Lin; Chin-Wen Chi; Pui-Ching Lee; Fan-Wei Tseng; Shou-Dong Lee
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Sociodemographic differences in early access to liver transplantation services.

Authors:  C L Bryce; D C Angus; R M Arnold; C-C H Chang; M H Farrell; C Manzarbeitia; I R Marino; M S Roberts
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.

Authors:  Cynthia A Moylan; Carla W Brady; Jeffrey L Johnson; Alastair D Smith; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Andrew J Muir
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  22 in total

1.  Shorter Height Is Associated With Lower Probability of Liver Transplantation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Eric Lee; Monika Sarkar; Jennifer Dodge; Maureen Kohi; Neil Mehta
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Race and Gender Disparity in the Surgical Management of Hepatocellular Cancer: Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program Registry.

Authors:  Michael Darden; Geoffrey Parker; Dominique Monlezun; Edward Anderson; Joseph F Buell
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Quantifying Sex-Based Disparities in Liver Allocation.

Authors:  Jayme E Locke; Brittany A Shelton; Kim M Olthoff; Elizabeth A Pomfret; Kimberly A Forde; Deirdre Sawinski; Meagan Gray; Nancy L Ascher
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  Hospitalized Women With Cirrhosis Have More Nonhepatic Comorbidities and Associated Complications Than Men.

Authors:  Jessica B Rubin; Yanin T Srisengfa; Somaya Albhaisi; Chathur Acharya; Gayatri Nangia; Tahira Shaikh; Leroy R Thacker; K Rajender Reddy; Puneeta Tandon; Jasmohan S Bajaj; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  MELD 3.0: The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Updated for the Modern Era.

Authors:  W Ray Kim; Ajitha Mannalithara; Julie K Heimbach; Patrick S Kamath; Sumeet K Asrani; Scott W Biggins; Nicholas L Wood; Sommer E Gentry; Allison J Kwong
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Correcting the sex disparity in access to liver transplantation: Lest perfect be the enemy of better.

Authors:  Allison J Kwong; Jennifer C Lai; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 9.369

7.  Women who undergo liver transplant have longer length of stay post-transplant compared with men.

Authors:  Jessica B Rubin; Giuseppe Cullaro; Jin Ge; Jennifer C Lai
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 5.828

8.  Development and Validation of a Model to Predict Long-Term Survival After Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  David Goldberg; Alejandro Mantero; Craig Newcomb; Cindy Delgado; Kimberly Forde; David Kaplan; Binu John; Nadine Nuchovich; Barbara Dominguez; Ezekiel Emanuel; Peter P Reese
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Sex Differences in Portopulmonary Hypertension.

Authors:  Hilary M DuBrock; Rodrigo Cartin-Ceba; Richard N Channick; Steven M Kawut; Michael J Krowka
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Correcting the sex disparity in MELD-Na.

Authors:  Nicholas L Wood; Douglas VanDerwerken; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 9.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.