Literature DB >> 29574563

Change in Health Insurance Coverage After Liver Transplantation Can Be Associated with Worse Outcomes.

Clifford Akateh1,2,3, Dmitry Tumin4,5, Eliza W Beal6,7, Khalid Mumtaz8, Joseph D Tobias4,9, Don Hayes10,11,5, Sylvester M Black7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health insurance coverage changes for many patients after liver transplantation, but the implications of this change on long-term outcomes are unclear. AIMS: To assess post-transplant patient and graft survival according to change in insurance coverage within 1 year of transplantation.
METHODS: We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing for patients between ages 18-64 years undergoing liver transplantation in 2002-2016. Patients surviving > 1 year were categorized by insurance coverage at transplantation and the 1-year transplant anniversary. Multivariable Cox regression characterized the association between coverage pattern and long-term patient or graft survival.
RESULTS: Among 34,487 patients in the analysis, insurance coverage patterns included continuous private coverage (58%), continuous public coverage (29%), private to public transition (8%) and public to private transition (4%). In multivariable analysis of patient survival, continuous public insurance (HR 1.29, CI 1.22, 1.37, p < 0.001), private to public transition (HR 1.17, CI 1.07, 1.28, p < 0.001), and public to private transition (HR 1.14, CI 1.00, 1.29, p = 0.044), were associated with greater mortality hazard, compared to continuous private coverage. After disaggregating public coverage by source, mortality hazard was highest for patients transitioning from private insurance to Medicaid (HR vs. continuous private coverage = 1.32; 95% CI 1.14, 1.52; p < 0.001). Similar differences by insurance category were found for death-censored graft failure.
CONCLUSION: Post-transplant transition to public insurance coverage is associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes when compared to retaining private coverage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Graft survival; Human; Insurance; Liver transplantation; Medicaid; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29574563      PMCID: PMC6425937          DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5031-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  36 in total

1.  Insurance and education predict long-term survival after orthotopic heart transplantation in the United States.

Authors:  Jeremiah G Allen; Eric S Weiss; George J Arnaoutakis; Stuart D Russell; William A Baumgartner; Ashish S Shah; John V Conte
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 10.247

2.  How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory.

Authors:  John W Graham; Allison E Olchowski; Tamika D Gilreath
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2007-06-05

3.  Insurance status of U.S. organ donors and transplant recipients: the uninsured give, but rarely receive.

Authors:  Andrew A Herring; Steffie Woolhandler; David U Himmelstein
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.663

4.  Role of Patient Factors and Practice Patterns in Determining Access to Liver Waitlist.

Authors:  J T Adler; N Dong; J F Markmann; D Schoenfeld; H Yeh
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  What liver transplant outcomes can be expected in the uninsured who become insured via the Affordable Care Act?

Authors:  L N Glueckert; D Redden; M A Thompson; A Haque; S H Gray; J Locke; D E Eckhoff; M Fouad; D A DuBay
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  Implications of expanded medicaid eligibility for patient outcomes after liver transplantation: Caveat emptor.

Authors:  Barry Schlansky; Carmel Shachar
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.799

7.  Did Pre-Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion Increase Access to Surgical Cancer Care?

Authors:  Waddah B Al-Refaie; Chaoyi Zheng; Manila Jindal; Michele Lee Clements; Patryce Toye; Lynt B Johnson; David Xiao; Timothy Westmoreland; Thomas DeLeire; Nawar Shara
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  High Center Volume Does Not Mitigate Risk Associated with Using High Donor Risk Organs in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Eliza W Beal; Sylvester M Black; Khalid Mumtaz; Don Hayes; Ashraf El-Hinnawi; Kenneth Washburn; Dmitry Tumin
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Sociodemographic differences in early access to liver transplantation services.

Authors:  C L Bryce; D C Angus; R M Arnold; C-C H Chang; M H Farrell; C Manzarbeitia; I R Marino; M S Roberts
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  The Effect of Race, Sex, and Insurance Status on Time-to-Listing Decisions for Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  Cindy L Bryce; Chung-Chou Ho Chang; Derek C Angus; Robert M Arnold; Maxwell Farrell; Mark S Roberts
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2010-12-23
View more
  2 in total

1.  County Rankings Have Limited Utility When Predicting Liver Transplant Outcomes.

Authors:  Clifford Akateh; Rebecca Miller; Eliza W Beal; Dmitry Tumin; Joseph D Tobias; Don Hayes; Sylvester M Black
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Thirty-day readmission rates, trends and its impact on liver transplantation recipients: a national analysis.

Authors:  Khalid Mumtaz; Jannel Lee-Allen; Kyle Porter; Sean Kelly; James Hanje; Lanla F Conteh; Anthony J Michaels; Ashraf El-Hinnawi; Ken Washburn; Sylvester M Black; Marwan S Abougergi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.