Literature DB >> 19644654

Effects of biosilicate and bioglass 45S5 on tibial bone consolidation on rats: a biomechanical and a histological study.

Renata N Granito1, Daniel Araki Ribeiro, Ana Claudia M Rennó, Christian Ravagnani, Paulo S Bossini, Oscar Peitl-Filho, Edgar D Zanotto, Nivaldo A Parizotto, Jorge Oishi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of Bioglass 45S5 and Biosilicate, on bone defects inflicted on the tibia of rats. Fifty male Wistar rats were used in this study, and divided into five groups, including a control group, to test Biosilicate and Bioglass materials of two different particle sizes (180-212 microm or 300-355 microm). All animals were sacrificed 15 days after surgery. No significant differences (P > 0.05) were found when values for Maximal load, Energy Absorption and Structural Stiffness were compared among the groups. Histopathological evaluation revealed osteogenic activity in the bone defect for the control group. Nevertheless, it seems that the amount of fully formed bone was higher in specimens treated with Biosilicate (granulometry 300-355 microm) when compared to the control group. The same picture occurred regarding Biosilicate with granulometry 180-212 microm. Morphometric findings for bone area results (%) showed no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) among the groups. Taken together, such findings suggest that, Biosilicate exerts more osteogenic activity when compared to Bioglass under subjective histopathological analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19644654     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-009-3824-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  20 in total

1.  The biomimetics of bone: engineered glass-ceramics a paradigm for in vitro biomineralization studies.

Authors:  Christine Loty; Jean-Michel Sautier; Sabine Loty; Susan Hattar; Audrey Asselin; Martine Oboeuf; Tadashi Kokubo; Huyn-Min Kim; Habib Boulekbache; Ariane Berdal
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.417

Review 2.  Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP.

Authors:  Emanuel Gautier; Christoph Sommer
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Osteoblast attachment and mineralized nodule formation on rough and smooth 45S5 bioactive glass monoliths.

Authors:  J E Gough; I Notingher; L L Hench
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 4.  Bioactive glass three decades on.

Authors:  Mark V Thomas; David A Puleo; Mohanad Al-Sabbagh
Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants       Date:  2005

5.  Low-intensity ultrasound enhances maturation of callus after segmental transport.

Authors:  Lutz Claes; Axel Rüter; Edgar Mayr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Low-level laser therapy modulates cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression during bone repair in rats.

Authors:  Mariza A Matsumoto; Rafael V Ferino; Giovanni F Monteleone; Daniel A Ribeiro
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Low-level laser therapy improves bone repair in rats treated with anti-inflammatory drugs.

Authors:  D A Ribeiro; M A Matsumoto
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.837

Review 8.  The enhancement of bone regeneration by ultrasound.

Authors:  Lutz Claes; Bettina Willie
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  In vitro biocompatibility of 45S5 Bioglass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds coated with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate).

Authors:  Oana Bretcanu; Superb Misra; Ipsita Roy; Chiara Renghini; Fabrizio Fiori; Aldo R Boccaccini; Vehid Salih
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.963

10.  Differential alkaline phosphatase responses of rat and human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells to 45S5 bioactive glass.

Authors:  Gwendolen C Reilly; Shula Radin; Andrew T Chen; Paul Ducheyne
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 12.479

View more
  9 in total

1.  A novel bioactive vitroceramic presents similar biological responses as autogenous bone grafts.

Authors:  Mariza Akemi Matsumoto; Gustavo Caviquioli; Claudia Cristina Biguetti; Leandro de Andrade Holgado; Patrícia Pinto Saraiva; Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó; Roberto Yoshio Kawakami
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Experimental maxillary sinus augmentation using a highly bioactive glass ceramic.

Authors:  Rodrigo Ricci Vivan; Carlos Eduardo Mecca; Claudia Cristina Biguetti; Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó; Roberta Okamoto; Bruno Cavalini Cavenago; Marco Húngaro Duarte; Mariza Akemi Matsumoto
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Porous bioactive scaffolds: characterization and biological performance in a model of tibial bone defect in rats.

Authors:  Hueliton Wilian Kido; Carla Roberta Tim; Paulo Sérgio Bossini; Nivaldo Antônio Parizotto; Cynthia Aparecida de Castro; Murilo Camuri Crovace; Ana Candida Martins Rodrigues; Edgar Dutra Zanotto; Oscar Peitl Filho; Fernanda de Freitas Anibal; Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Effect of a new bioactive fibrous glassy scaffold on bone repair.

Authors:  P R Gabbai-Armelin; M T Souza; H W Kido; C R Tim; P S Bossini; A M P Magri; K R Fernandes; F A C Pastor; E D Zanotto; N A Parizotto; O Peitl; A C M Renno
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Low level laser therapy does not modulate the outcomes of a highly bioactive glass-ceramic (Biosilicate) on bone consolidation in rats.

Authors:  Poliani Oliveira; Daniel Araki Ribeiro; Elaine Favaro Pipi; Patricia Driusso; Nivaldo A Parizotto; Ana Claudia Muniz Renno
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Evaluation of Crystallized Biosilicate in the Reconstruction of Calvarial Defects.

Authors:  Marcelo Rodrigues Azenha; Suzie Aparecida de Lacerda; Heloísa Fonseca Marão; Oscar Peitl Filho; Osvaldo Magro Filho
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-03-10

Review 7.  Characterization and in vivo biological performance of biosilicate.

Authors:  Ana Claudia M Renno; Paulo Sérgio Bossini; Murilo C Crovace; Ana Candida M Rodrigues; Edgar Dutra Zanotto; Nivaldo Antonio Parizotto
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Fabrication and Characterization of Scaffolds of Poly(ε-caprolactone)/Biosilicate® Biocomposites Prepared by Generative Manufacturing Process.

Authors:  Daniel Aparecido Lopes Vieira da Cunha; Paulo Inforçatti Neto; Kelli Cristina Micocci; Caroline Faria Bellani; Heloisa Sobreiro Selistre-de-Araujo; Zilda Castro Silveira; Marcia Cristina Branciforti
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2019-02-03

9.  COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF LOW-LEVEL LASER AND LOW-INTENSITY ULTRASOUND ASSOCIATED WITH BIOSILICATE(®) ON THE PROCESS OF BONE REPAIR IN THE RAT TIBIA.

Authors:  Poliani de Oliveira; Kelly Rosseti Fernandes; Evandro Fornias Sperandio; Fabio Alexandre Casarin Pastor; Keico Okino Nonaka; Nivaldo Antonio Parizotto; Ana Claudia Muniz Renno
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.