Literature DB >> 19170250

In vitro biocompatibility of 45S5 Bioglass-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds coated with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate).

Oana Bretcanu1, Superb Misra, Ipsita Roy, Chiara Renghini, Fabrizio Fiori, Aldo R Boccaccini, Vehid Salih.   

Abstract

The aim of this work was to study the in vitro biocompatibility of glass-ceramic scaffolds based on 45S5 Bioglass, using a human osteosarcoma cell line (HOS-TE85). The highly porous scaffolds were produced by the foam replication technique. Two different types of scaffolds with different porosities were analysed. They were coated with a biodegradable polymer, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (P(3HB)). The scaffold bioactivity was evaluated by soaking in a simulated body fluid (SBF) for different durations. Compression strength tests were performed before and after immersion in SBF. These experiments showed that the scaffolds are highly bioactive, as after a few days of immersion in SBF a hydroxyapatite-like layer was formed on the scaffold's surface. It was also observed that P(3HB)-coated samples exhibited higher values of compression strength than uncoated samples. Biocompatibility assessment was carried out by qualitative evaluation of cell morphology after different culture periods, using scanning electron microscopy, while cell proliferation was determined by using the AlamarBlue assay. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OC) assays were used as quantitative in vitro indicators of osteoblast function. Two different types of medium were used for ALP and OC tests: normal supplemented medium and osteogenic medium. HOS cells were seeded and cultured onto the scaffolds for up to 2 weeks. The AlamarBlue assay showed that cells were able to proliferate and grow on the scaffold surface. After 7 days in culture, the P(3HB)-coated samples had a higher number of cells on their surfaces than the uncoated samples. Regarding ALP- and OC-specific activity, no significant differences were found between samples with different pore sizes. All scaffolds containing osteogenic medium seemed to have a slightly higher level of ALP and OC concentration. These experiments confirmed that Bioglass/P(3HB) scaffolds have potential as osteoconductive tissue engineering substrates for maintenance and normal functioning of bone tissue. (c) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19170250     DOI: 10.1002/term.150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  20 in total

1.  Osteogenic differentiation of human dental pulp stromal cells on 45S5 Bioglass® based scaffolds in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Reem El-Gendy; Xuebin B Yang; Phillipa J Newby; Aldo R Boccaccini; Jennifer Kirkham
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Toward Strong and Tough Glass and Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Repair.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Mohamed N Rahaman; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 18.808

3.  Bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future perspectives.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Eduardo Saiz; Mohamed N Rahaman; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 7.328

4.  Multiple silk coatings on biphasic calcium phosphate scaffolds: effect on physical and mechanical properties and in vitro osteogenic response of human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Jiao Jiao Li; Eun Seok Gil; Rebecca S Hayden; Chunmei Li; Seyed-Iman Roohani-Esfahani; David L Kaplan; Hala Zreiqat
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 6.988

5.  Investigating the Effects of Surface-Initiated Polymerization of ε-Caprolactone to Bioactive Glass Particles on the Mechanical Properties of Settable Polymer/Ceramic Composites.

Authors:  Andrew J Harmata; Catherine L Ward; Katarzyna J Zienkiewicz; Joseph C Wenke; Scott A Guelcher
Journal:  J Mater Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.089

6.  Strength, toughness, and reliability of a porous glass/biopolymer composite scaffold.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Weitao Jia; Grace Y Lau; Antoni P Tomsia
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Effects of biosilicate and bioglass 45S5 on tibial bone consolidation on rats: a biomechanical and a histological study.

Authors:  Renata N Granito; Daniel Araki Ribeiro; Ana Claudia M Rennó; Christian Ravagnani; Paulo S Bossini; Oscar Peitl-Filho; Edgar D Zanotto; Nivaldo A Parizotto; Jorge Oishi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Bone regeneration in strong porous bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds with an oriented microstructure implanted in rat calvarial defects.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Qiang Fu
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Tetracycline-encapsulated P(3HB) microsphere-coated 45S5 Bioglass(®)-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  D Meng; L Francis; I D Thompson; C Mierke; H Huebner; A Amtmann; I Roy; A R Boccaccini
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  One-step method for the preparation of poly(methyl methacrylate) modified titanium-bioactive glass three-dimensional scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Xiao Han; Huiming Lin; Xiang Chen; Xin Li; Gang Guo; Fengyu Qu
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.