Literature DB >> 26225059

Evaluation of Crystallized Biosilicate in the Reconstruction of Calvarial Defects.

Marcelo Rodrigues Azenha1, Suzie Aparecida de Lacerda2, Heloísa Fonseca Marão3, Oscar Peitl Filho4, Osvaldo Magro Filho3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the bone repair process of crystallized Biosilicate in surgically created defects on rats' calvaria. This biomaterial was recently developed for odontological use.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used fifteen rats (rattus norvegicus albinus, Wistar), and two 5 mm surgical defects were performed on each of them; the defects were made with trephine drill on the calvarium region prior to the biomaterial placement. Groups were divided as follows: Group 1-defect filled with clot; Group 2-defect filled with crystallized Biosilicate. After 7, 14 and 28 days the animals were killed, the parts were retrieved and slides were prepared for histological studies.
RESULTS: Bone formation was satisfactory in all groups, with direct contact between biomaterial surface and bone and absence of infection signs. The 28 days periods showed better results, and statistically significant difference between Clot Group (90.2 %) and Biosilicate (58 %; p = 0.002) was seen, regarding presence of bone tissue on the surgical defects.
CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that defects filled with clot present better results on bone formation compared to crystallized Biosilicate, which is considered a biocompatible material with favorable osteoconductive properties.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioglass; Biomaterial; Biosilicate

Year:  2015        PMID: 26225059      PMCID: PMC4511902          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-015-0755-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  23 in total

Review 1.  Third-generation biomedical materials.

Authors:  Larry L Hench; Julia M Polak
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  A novel bioactive vitroceramic presents similar biological responses as autogenous bone grafts.

Authors:  Mariza Akemi Matsumoto; Gustavo Caviquioli; Claudia Cristina Biguetti; Leandro de Andrade Holgado; Patrícia Pinto Saraiva; Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó; Roberto Yoshio Kawakami
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Bone response to three different chemical compositions of fluorcanasite glass-ceramic.

Authors:  Valdemar Mallet da Rocha Barros; Jorge Luiz J Liporaci; Adalberto L Rosa; Marcela Caffarena Junqueira; Paulo Tambasco de Oliveira; Anthony Johnson; Richard van Noort
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Assessment of antimicrobial effect of Biosilicate® against anaerobic, microaerophilic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms.

Authors:  Carlos Henrique Gomes Martins; Tatiane Cruz Carvalho; Maria Gorete Mendes Souza; Christian Ravagnani; Oscar Peitl; Edgar Dutra Zanotto; Heitor Panzeri; Luciana Assirati Casemiro
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Bioactive ceramics.

Authors:  L L Hench
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Tissue response to Bioglass endosseous ridge maintenance implants.

Authors:  J Wilson; A E Clark; M Hall; L L Hench
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Bone healing in critical-size defects treated with bioactive glass/calcium sulfate: a histologic and histometric study in rat calvaria.

Authors:  Flávia A C Furlaneto; Maria J H Nagata; Stephen E Fucini; Tatiana M Deliberador; Tetuo Okamoto; Michel R Messora
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 8.  Biomaterials for repair of orbital floor blowout fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dharmindra Rajah Gunarajah; Nabil Samman
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Effects of biosilicate and bioglass 45S5 on tibial bone consolidation on rats: a biomechanical and a histological study.

Authors:  Renata N Granito; Daniel Araki Ribeiro; Ana Claudia M Rennó; Christian Ravagnani; Paulo S Bossini; Oscar Peitl-Filho; Edgar D Zanotto; Nivaldo A Parizotto; Jorge Oishi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.896

10.  Immunoexpression of Cbfa-1/Runx2 and VEGF in sinus lift procedures using bone substitutes in rabbits.

Authors:  Leandro Soeiro De Souza Nunes; Renato Victor De Oliveira; Leandro Andrade Holgado; Hugo Nary Filho; Daniel Araki Ribeiro; Mariza Akemi Matsumoto
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-01-23       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review.

Authors:  Wenhao Wang; Kelvin W K Yeung
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2017-06-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.