Literature DB >> 25893392

Effect of a new bioactive fibrous glassy scaffold on bone repair.

P R Gabbai-Armelin1, M T Souza, H W Kido, C R Tim, P S Bossini, A M P Magri, K R Fernandes, F A C Pastor, E D Zanotto, N A Parizotto, O Peitl, A C M Renno.   

Abstract

Researchers have investigated several therapeutic approaches to treat non-union fractures. Among these, bioactive glasses and glass ceramics have been widely used as grafts. This class of biomaterial has the ability to integrate with living bone. Nevertheless, bioglass and bioactive materials have been used mainly as powder and blocks, compromising the filling of irregular bone defects. Considering this matter, our research group has developed a new bioactive glass composition that can originate malleable fibers, which can offer a more suitable material to be used as bone graft substitutes. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the morphological structure (via scanning electron microscope) of these fibers upon incubation in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) after 1, 7 and 14 days and, also, evaluate the in vivo tissue response to the new biomaterial using implantation in rat tibial defects. The histopathological, immunohistochemistry and biomechanical analyzes after 15, 30 and 60 days of implantation were performed to investigate the effects of the material on bone repair. The PBS incubation indicated that the fibers of the glassy scaffold degraded over time. The histological analysis revealed a progressive degradation of the material with increasing implantation time and also its substitution by granulation tissue and woven bone. Histomorphometry showed a higher amount of newly formed bone area in the control group (CG) compared to the biomaterial group (BG) 15 days post-surgery. After 30 and 60 days, CG and BG showed a similar amount of newly formed bone. The novel biomaterial enhanced the expression of RUNX-2 and RANK-L, and also improved the mechanical properties of the tibial callus at day 15 after surgery. These results indicated a promising use of the new biomaterial for bone engineering. However, further long-term studies should be carried out to provide additional information concerning the material degradation in the later stages and the bone regeneration induced by the fibrous material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25893392     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-015-5516-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  41 in total

1.  Calcium phosphate/poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) composite bone substitute materials: evaluation of temporal degradation and bone ingrowth in a rat critical-sized cranial defect.

Authors:  Floor C J van de Watering; Jeroen J J P van den Beucken; X Frank Walboomers; John A Jansen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Modeling the interactions between osteoblast and osteoclast activities in bone remodeling.

Authors:  Vincent Lemaire; Frank L Tobin; Larry D Greller; Carolyn R Cho; Larry J Suva
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 2.691

3.  The effect of ionic products from bioactive glass dissolution on osteoblast proliferation and collagen production.

Authors:  Patricia Valerio; Marivalda M Pereira; Alfredo M Goes; M Fatima Leite
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics.

Authors:  Maddalena Mastrogiacomo; Silvia Scaglione; Roberta Martinetti; Laura Dolcini; Francesco Beltrame; Ranieri Cancedda; Rodolfo Quarto
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Tissue engineering for bone defect healing: an update on a multi-component approach.

Authors:  Inga Drosse; Elias Volkmer; Rodolfo Capanna; Pietro De Biase; Wolf Mutschler; Matthias Schieker
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  Angiogenic effects of borate glass microfibers in a rodent model.

Authors:  Yinan Lin; Roger F Brown; Steven B Jung; Delbert E Day
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.396

7.  Effects of biosilicate(®) scaffolds and low-level laser therapy on the process of bone healing.

Authors:  Karina Nogueira Zambone Pinto; Carla Roberta Tim; Murilo Camuri Crovace; Mariza Akemi Matsumoto; Nivaldo Antonio Parizotto; Edgar Dutra Zanotto; Oscar Peitl; Ana Claudia Muniz Rennó
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.796

8.  Incorporation of bioactive glass in calcium phosphate cement: An evaluation.

Authors:  A C M Renno; F C J van de Watering; M R Nejadnik; M C Crovace; E D Zanotto; J G C Wolke; J A Jansen; J J J P van den Beucken
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Endothelial nitric oxide synthase in the control of osteoblastic mineralizing activity and bone integrity.

Authors:  Faiza Afzal; Julia Polak; Lee Buttery
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.996

10.  Improved injectability and in vitro degradation of a calcium phosphate cement containing poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Qi; Jiandong Ye; Yingjun Wang
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 8.947

View more
  4 in total

1.  Bioactive Glass Fiber-Reinforced PGS Matrix Composites for Cartilage Regeneration.

Authors:  Marina Trevelin Souza; Samira Tansaz; Edgar Dutra Zanotto; Aldo R Boccaccini
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 3.623

2.  Electrospun F18 Bioactive Glass/PCL-Poly (ε-caprolactone)-Membrane for Guided Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  Lucas Hidalgo Pitaluga; Marina Trevelin Souza; Edgar Dutra Zanotto; Martin Eduardo Santocildes Romero; Paul V Hatton
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Comparison of two different biomaterials in the bone regeneration (15, 30 and 60 days) of critical defects in rats.

Authors:  Patricia Brassolatti; Paulo Sérgio Bossini; Ana Laura Martins de Andrade; Genoveva Lourdes Flores Luna; Juliana Virginio da Silva; Luciana Almeida-Lopes; Marcos Aurélio Napolitano; Lucimar Retto da Silva de Avó; Ângela Merice de Oliveira Leal; Fernanda de Freitas Anibal
Journal:  Acta Cir Bras       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 1.388

Review 4.  Biomaterials for bone regeneration: an orthopedic and dentistry overview.

Authors:  J Girón; E Kerstner; T Medeiros; L Oliveira; G M Machado; C F Malfatti; P Pranke
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.590

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.