Literature DB >> 19640048

The sensitivity of auditory-motor representations to subtle changes in auditory feedback while singing.

Dwayne Keough1, Jeffery A Jones.   

Abstract

Singing requires accurate control of the fundamental frequency (F0) of the voice. This study examined trained singers' and untrained singers' (nonsingers') sensitivity to subtle manipulations in auditory feedback and the subsequent effect on the mapping between F0 feedback and vocal control. Participants produced the consonant-vowel /ta/ while receiving auditory feedback that was shifted up and down in frequency. Results showed that singers and nonsingers compensated to a similar degree when presented with frequency-altered feedback (FAF); however, singers' F0 values were consistently closer to the intended pitch target. Moreover, singers initiated their compensatory responses when auditory feedback was shifted up or down 6 cents or more, compared to nonsingers who began compensating when feedback was shifted up 26 cents and down 22 cents. Additionally, examination of the first 50 ms of vocalization indicated that participants commenced subsequent vocal utterances, during FAF, near the F0 value on previous shift trials. Interestingly, nonsingers commenced F0 productions below the pitch target and increased their F0 until they matched the note. Thus, singers and nonsingers rely on an internal model to regulate voice F0, but singers' models appear to be more sensitive in response to subtle discrepancies in auditory feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19640048      PMCID: PMC2730714          DOI: 10.1121/1.3158600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  32 in total

1.  Effects of pitch-shift velocity on voice Fo responses.

Authors:  C R Larson; T A Burnett; S Kiran; T C Hain
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of frequency-shifted auditory feedback on voice F0 contours in syllables.

Authors:  Thomas M Donath; Ulrich Natke; Karl Th Kalveram
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Perceptual calibration of F0 production: evidence from feedback perturbation.

Authors:  J A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Control of voice fundamental frequency in speaking versus singing.

Authors:  Ulrich Natke; Thomas M Donath; Karl Th Kalveram
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Pitch matching accuracy of trained singers, untrained subjects with talented singing voices, and untrained subjects with nontalented singing voices in conditions of varying feedback.

Authors:  Christopher Watts; Jessica Murphy; Kathryn Barnes-Burroughs
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Localization of cerebral activity during simple singing.

Authors:  D W Perry; R J Zatorre; M Petrides; B Alivisatos; E Meyer; A C Evans
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-12-16       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: sound evidence for an encoding effect.

Authors:  Steven A Finney; Caroline Palmer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

8.  Early pitch-shift response is active in both steady and dynamic voice pitch control.

Authors:  Theresa A Burnett; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Articular reflex mechanisms in the larynx.

Authors:  J A Kirchner; B D Wyke
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1965-09       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Auditory-motor mapping for pitch control in singers and nonsingers.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; Dwayne Keough
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  13 in total

1.  Multiple instances of vocal sensorimotor adaptation to frequency-altered feedback within a single experimental session.

Authors:  Colin S Hawco; Jeffery A Jones
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Voice Onset Time in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders: Evidence for Disordered Vocal Motor Control.

Authors:  Victoria S McKenna; Jennifer A Hylkema; Monique C Tardif; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Contextual cuing contributes to the independent modification of multiple internal models for vocal control.

Authors:  Dwayne Keough; Jeffery A Jones
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Defne Abur; Nicole M Enos; Katherine M Brown; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Evidence for Auditory-Motor Impairment in Individuals With Hyperfunctional Voice Disorders.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; Rosemary A Lester-Smith; Defne Abur; Ayoub Daliri; J Pieter Noordzij; Ashling A Lupiani
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Modulation of auditory-vocal feedback control due to planned changes in voice fo.

Authors:  Jason H Kim; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Surmising synchrony of sound and sight: Factors explaining variance of audiovisual integration in hurdling, tap dancing and drumming.

Authors:  Nina Heins; Jennifer Pomp; Daniel S Kluger; Stefan Vinbrüx; Ima Trempler; Axel Kohler; Katja Kornysheva; Karen Zentgraf; Markus Raab; Ricarda I Schubotz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison of volitional opposing and following responses across speakers with different vocal histories.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Li Gao; Sophie Wang; Christine Gou; Jordan Manes; Donald A Robin; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Auditory-motor adaptation to frequency-altered auditory feedback occurs when participants ignore feedback.

Authors:  Dwayne Keough; Colin Hawco; Jeffery A Jones
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Sensorimotor adaptation of voice fundamental frequency in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Defne Abur; Rosemary A Lester-Smith; Ayoub Daliri; Ashling A Lupiani; Frank H Guenther; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.