Literature DB >> 21346208

Contextual cuing contributes to the independent modification of multiple internal models for vocal control.

Dwayne Keough1, Jeffery A Jones.   

Abstract

Research on the control of visually guided limb movements indicates that the brain learns and continuously updates an internal model that maps the relationship between motor commands and sensory feedback. A growing body of work suggests that an internal model that relates motor commands to sensory feedback also supports vocal control. There is evidence from arm-reaching studies that shows that when provided with a contextual cue, the motor system can acquire multiple internal models, which allows an animal to adapt to different perturbations in diverse contexts. In this study we show that trained singers can rapidly acquire multiple internal models regarding voice fundamental frequency (F(0)). These models accommodate different perturbations to ongoing auditory feedback. Participants heard three musical notes and reproduced each one in succession. The musical targets could serve as a contextual cue to indicate which direction (up or down) feedback would be altered on each trial; however, participants were not explicitly instructed to use this strategy. When participants were gradually exposed to altered feedback adaptation was observed immediately following vocal onset. Aftereffects were target specific and did not influence vocal productions on subsequent trials. When target notes were no longer a contextual cue, adaptation occurred during altered feedback trials and evidence for trial-by-trial adaptation was found. These findings indicate that the brain is exceptionally sensitive to the deviations between auditory feedback and the predicted consequence of a motor command during vocalization. Moreover, these results indicate that, with contextual cues, the vocal control system may maintain multiple internal models that are capable of independent modification during different tasks or environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21346208      PMCID: PMC3094194          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00291.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  31 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Kinematics and dynamics are not represented independently in motor working memory: evidence from an interference study.

Authors:  Christine Tong; Daniel M Wolpert; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; M Kawato
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1998-10

4.  Remapping auditory-motor representations in voice production.

Authors:  Jeffery A Jones; K G Munhall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Specificity of speech motor learning.

Authors:  Stéphanie Tremblay; Guillaume Houle; David J Ostry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Experience-dependent neural substrates involved in vocal pitch regulation during singing.

Authors:  Jean Mary Zarate; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Generalization to local remappings of the visuomotor coordinate transformation.

Authors:  Z Ghahramani; D M Wolpert; M I Jordan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Modular decomposition in visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Z Ghahramani; D M Wolpert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-03-27       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  A neural basis for auditory feedback control of vocal pitch.

Authors:  Michael Smotherman; Shuyi Zhang; Walter Metzner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Acquisition and contextual switching of multiple internal models for different viscous force fields.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Wada; Yasuhiro Kawabata; Shinya Kotosaka; Kenji Yamamoto; Shigeru Kitazawa; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.304

View more
  4 in total

1.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Adaptation in Mandarin tone production with pitch-shifted auditory feedback: Influence of tonal contrast requirements.

Authors:  Yongqiang Feng; Yan Xiao; Yonghong Yan; Ludo Max
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Songbirds can learn flexible contextual control over syllable sequencing.

Authors:  Lena Veit; Lucas Y Tian; Christian J Monroy Hernandez; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Auditory-motor adaptation to frequency-altered auditory feedback occurs when participants ignore feedback.

Authors:  Dwayne Keough; Colin Hawco; Jeffery A Jones
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-09       Impact factor: 3.288

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.