PURPOSE: To investigate reproducibility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) to measure hepatic triglyceride content (HTGC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 subjects, HTGC was evaluated using (1)H-MRS at 3.0 Tesla. We studied "between-weeks" reproducibility and reproducibility of (1)H-MRS in subjects with fatty liver. We also studied within liver variability and within day reproducibility. Reproducibility was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV), repeatability coefficient (RC), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The CV of between weeks reproducibility was 9.5%, with a RC of 1.3% HTGC (ICC 0.998). The CV in fatty livers was 4.1%, with a RC of 1.3% HTGC (ICC 0.997). Within day CV was 4.5%, with a RC of 0.4% HTGC (ICC 0.999). CV for within liver variability was 14.5%. CONCLUSION: Reproducibility of (1)H-MRS to measure HTGC for "between-weeks" measurements and in fatty livers is high, which is important for follow-up studies. Within liver variability displays a larger variation, meaning that liver fat is not equally distributed and during consecutive measurements the same voxel position should be used. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To investigate reproducibility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) to measure hepatic triglyceride content (HTGC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 24 subjects, HTGC was evaluated using (1)H-MRS at 3.0 Tesla. We studied "between-weeks" reproducibility and reproducibility of (1)H-MRS in subjects with fatty liver. We also studied within liver variability and within day reproducibility. Reproducibility was assessed by coefficient of variation (CV), repeatability coefficient (RC), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: The CV of between weeks reproducibility was 9.5%, with a RC of 1.3% HTGC (ICC 0.998). The CV in fatty livers was 4.1%, with a RC of 1.3% HTGC (ICC 0.997). Within day CV was 4.5%, with a RC of 0.4% HTGC (ICC 0.999). CV for within liver variability was 14.5%. CONCLUSION: Reproducibility of (1)H-MRS to measure HTGC for "between-weeks" measurements and in fatty livers is high, which is important for follow-up studies. Within liver variability displays a larger variation, meaning that liver fat is not equally distributed and during consecutive measurements the same voxel position should be used. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Susanne Bonekamp; An Tang; Arian Mashhood; Tanya Wolfson; Christopher Changchien; Michael S Middleton; Lisa Clark; Anthony Gamst; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Milan Hájek; Monika Dezortová; Dita Wagnerová; Antonín Skoch; Luděk Voska; Irena Hejlová; Pavel Trunečka Journal: MAGMA Date: 2011-07-10 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Cheng William Hong; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Jonathan C Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Top Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-12
Authors: Steve C N Hui; Simon K H Wong; Qiyong Ai; David K W Yeung; Enders K W Ng; Winnie C W Chu Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Maartje E Visser; Fatima Akdim; Diane L Tribble; Aart J Nederveen; T Jesse Kwoh; John J P Kastelein; Mieke D Trip; Erik S G Stroes Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 5.922