PURPOSE: To describe the spatial distribution of liver fat,using MRI-estimated proton density fat fraction (PDFF), in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Investigational Review Board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study prospectively enrolled 50 adults (30 women, 20 men) with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Hepatic PDFF was measured by low-flip-angle multiecho spoiled gradient-recalled-echo MRI at 3 Tesla. Three nonoverlapping regions of interest were placed within each liver segment. Statistical analyses included Pearson's correlation, multivariable linear regression, and permutation-based paired tests. RESULTS: The study population's mean whole-liver PDFF was 16.1% (range: 1.6–39.6%). The mean whole-liver PDFF variability was 1.9% (range: 0.7–4.5%). Higher variability was associated with higher PDFF (r=0.34;P=0.0156). The mean PDFF was significantly higher in the right lobe than the left (16.5% versus 15.3%, P=0.0028). The mean PDFF variability was higher in the left lobe than the right (1.86% versus 1.28%; P<0.0001). Segment II had the lowest mean segmental PDFF (14.8%);segment VIII had the highest (16.7%). Segments V(0.71%) and VI (0.70%) had the lowest mean segmental PDFF variability; segment II had the highest (1.32%). CONCLUSION: IN adult NAFLD there are small but significant differences in fat content.
PURPOSE: To describe the spatial distribution of liver fat,using MRI-estimated proton density fat fraction (PDFF), in adults with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This Investigational Review Board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study prospectively enrolled 50 adults (30 women, 20 men) with biopsy-proven NAFLD. Hepatic PDFF was measured by low-flip-angle multiecho spoiled gradient-recalled-echo MRI at 3 Tesla. Three nonoverlapping regions of interest were placed within each liver segment. Statistical analyses included Pearson's correlation, multivariable linear regression, and permutation-based paired tests. RESULTS: The study population's mean whole-liver PDFF was 16.1% (range: 1.6–39.6%). The mean whole-liver PDFF variability was 1.9% (range: 0.7–4.5%). Higher variability was associated with higher PDFF (r=0.34;P=0.0156). The mean PDFF was significantly higher in the right lobe than the left (16.5% versus 15.3%, P=0.0028). The mean PDFF variability was higher in the left lobe than the right (1.86% versus 1.28%; P<0.0001). Segment II had the lowest mean segmental PDFF (14.8%);segment VIII had the highest (16.7%). Segments V(0.71%) and VI (0.70%) had the lowest mean segmental PDFF variability; segment II had the highest (1.32%). CONCLUSION: IN adult NAFLD there are small but significant differences in fat content.
Authors: Lidia S Szczepaniak; Pamela Nurenberg; David Leonard; Jeffrey D Browning; Jason S Reingold; Scott Grundy; Helen H Hobbs; Robert L Dobbins Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-08-31 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: Hero K Hussain; Thomas L Chenevert; Frank J Londy; Vikas Gulani; Scott D Swanson; Barbara J McKenna; Henry D Appelman; Saroja Adusumilli; Joel K Greenson; Hari S Conjeevaram Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-10-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: G Marchesini; M Brizi; G Bianchi; S Tomassetti; E Bugianesi; M Lenzi; A J McCullough; S Natale; G Forlani; N Melchionda Journal: Diabetes Date: 2001-08 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Rohit Loomba; Maria Abraham; Aynur Unalp; Laura Wilson; Joel Lavine; Ed Doo; Nathan M Bass Journal: Hepatology Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Aliya Qayyum; Jeffrey S Goh; Sanjay Kakar; Benjamin M Yeh; Raphael B Merriman; Fergus V Coakley Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Steven Woon Choy Tsang; Wing Fung Ng; Brian Ping Ying Wu; David Alan Chow; Eric Ting Ho Li; Tak Cheung Wong Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.029
Authors: Michael S Middleton; Elhamy R Heba; Catherine A Hooker; Mustafa R Bashir; Kathryn J Fowler; Kumar Sandrasegaran; Elizabeth M Brunt; David E Kleiner; Edward Doo; Mark L Van Natta; Joel E Lavine; Brent A Neuschwander-Tetri; Arun Sanyal; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Cheng William Hong; Tanya Wolfson; Ethan Z Sy; Alexandra N Schlein; Jonathan C Hooker; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Gavin Hamilton; Scott B Reeder; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-08-26 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jonathan C Hooker; Gavin Hamilton; Charlie C Park; Steven Liao; Tanya Wolfson; Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy; Cheng William Hong; Adrija Mamidipalli; Anthony Gamst; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2019-02
Authors: I Doycheva; J Cui; P Nguyen; E A Costa; J Hooker; H Hofflich; R Bettencourt; S Brouha; C B Sirlin; R Loomba Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Paul M Manning; Gavin Hamilton; Kang Wang; Chulhyun Park; Jonathan C Hooker; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; William M Haufe; Alex N Schlein; Michael S Middleton; Claude B Sirlin Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2017-03